Third Session, 42nd Parliament (2022)
OFFICIAL REPORT
OF DEBATES
(HANSARD)
Wednesday, February 9, 2022
Afternoon Sitting
Issue No. 143
ISSN 1499-2175
The HTML transcript is provided for informational purposes only.
The PDF transcript remains the official digital version.
CONTENTS
Routine Business | |
Orders of the Day | |
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2022
The House met at 1:33 p.m.
[Mr. Speaker in the chair.]
Routine Business
Prayers and reflections: Hon. B. Ma.
Introductions by Members
S. Bond: I have two important tasks today.
First of all, on behalf of the official opposition and the new leader of the B.C. Liberal Party, we want to say how happy we are to have the Premier back in the Legislature. We, like all British Columbians, felt so very concerned about the diagnosis of cancer and the follow-up treatment that was necessary.
We also recognize that the Premier wasn’t the only one impacted by his health care challenges — his family, his friends, his colleagues in this place and his staff. From all accounts, the Premier continued to work and face this difficult journey with a positive attitude and his sense of humour.
Welcome back, Premier. Some things transcend partisan politics, and this is one of them. We wish you nothing but continued good health in the days ahead.
Secondly, I also want to take the opportunity to welcome a very special person to the Legislature today. He is definitely not a stranger to this chamber, having served as a member of the Legislative Assembly for more than a decade. During that time, he held many significant portfolios, including Deputy Premier, Minister of Finance, Minister of Health, to name just a few.
He’s passionate about British Columbia, and he has demonstrated that with a long list of accomplishments during his time as an MLA and a cabinet minister. He has also cared deeply about his community and province. He has served on several non-profit organizations, including Canuck Place Foundation and the Streetohome Foundation.
I know him to be the loving husband to his wife, Jessica, the proud dad of daughters Josephine and Rose. In fact, they are the reason he made a decision to return to public service. After a very lengthy leadership campaign, on Saturday night, he was elected, in a decisive win, to be the leader of the B.C. Liberal Party.
The next step will be for him to take his place in this seat as the Leader of the Official Opposition. I have every confidence that the Premier and his government will want to see that happen as quickly as we do. We are very excited to welcome back someone I consider a friend and exceptional colleague.
I hope colleagues will welcome Kevin Falcon as the Leader of the Opposition very shortly and will help him, as our new B.C. Liberal leader, feel welcome in the chamber today.
Welcome, Kevin.
Hon. J. Horgan: I had something to say yesterday about my appreciation to all of you. I did not, at that time, say that there are other members of this House facing the same challenges right now that I am. Of course, we all know who those members are, and my thoughts go out to them and their families as they go through what I know is a very challenging time.
Last Friday was World Cancer Day, and 85 people in British Columbia had a diagnosis of cancer. The day after that, another 85, and the day after that, another 85. Thirty-one thousand people this year will be diagnosed with cancer. That’s not just 31,000 individuals but families and friends, as the Leader of the Opposition said.
This is something that affects all of us. I want to just say to those members who are in this House right now grappling with this issue, we are all behind you. As the member said, these types of things transcend the politics.
We have had many moments in the past two years where we have all stood and said those very things. I appreciate that we’re going to be going into the rock-throwing session in about 15 minutes. Rocks need to be thrown, and they will be knocked back. But when we’re doing that, we’re all doing it with the sense of humanity that all of us come to represent. With that, I thank the member for her intervention, and for those who almost brought a tear to my eye yesterday, I appreciate that sentiment.
With that, I want to also offer my congratulations to…. Yesterday, in a press conference, I said: “Minister.” I said: “No, I mean Member.” Then I said: “No, I mean citizen.”
Citizen Falcon — I can call you that today — and, of course, leader of the B.C. Liberal Party, congratulations. Welcome back. I know you’re a row behind where you want to be, and we can work on that in the days and weeks and months ahead.
B. Anderson: I would like to welcome my parents, who are visiting us today. This is their first time that they’ve been able to join us here in the Legislature. Their names are Deb and Terry Anderson, and they have been incredibly supportive to me. They’re loving, they’re kind, and I’m fighting for people and the environment because of them. They give me lots of inspiration, and I love them so much.
K. Kirkpatrick: Today I’d like to welcome to the House Elena Lawson and Nancy Walton, two very passionate advocates for young people with autism.
Thank you so much for being here today.
G. Kyllo: This may sound a little bit repetitive, but I’m standing now for my tenth time to announce the birth of my tenth grandchild. We are blessed with our tenth grandchild, our fourth grandson, Noah Glen Hansma, who was born on the 29th of January.
I just want to give my daughter, Samantha, and Michael all the congratulations, and his older brother, Harvey, who is now three and quickly realizing that he’s no longer the centre of the universe, with little Noah here.
Would the House please make Noah Glen Hansma feel very welcome.
T. Halford: I often see them at pickup and drop-off at White Rock Elementary. Today I am proud to recognize two constituents of mine that have joined us to speak about the concerns regarding autism funding.
Rozann Pedersen and Dione Costanzo, I welcome you to the House today.
T. Shypitka: Apparently, I have some work cut out for me to catch up to my colleague from Shuswap. I would like to announce my second grandchild. Nina Akiko Shypitka was born on January 23.
I’d love to give a big congratulations out to my son Dustin, his wife, Julie, and Nina’s brother Hudson.
Please welcome Nina.
S. Cadieux: I am not announcing grandchildren. I feel really left out, though.
I am pleased to welcome two fierce advocates to the House, Louise Witt and Michele Clark.
Tributes
SARA McDONALD
R. Merrifield: I rise today, actually, with some sadness. I want to rise to acknowledge one of my constituents who sadly lost her life ten days ago. Sara McDonald was a passionate advocate against, and for the end to, ALS.
Today I’m going to use her words, published in a Vancouver Sun article just over a year ago: “I try very hard to stay positive and be proactive concerning all aspects of my health, including my emotional state. But it’s hard, and it’s getting harder. It is a struggle to stay upbeat when my body is incrementally losing function in a way that greatly impacts quality of life. Simple tasks like dressing and moving around are becoming exhausting. Since losing the ability to speak, it has become a challenge to stay connected to others.”
I had the privilege of meeting with Sara and her daughter, who helped her to communicate, as I was serving as Health critic.
Today I rise to honour Sara’s life and to vow that I will continue her fight to end ALS. Please join me.
Introductions by Members
P. Milobar: It gives me pleasure to rise today to acknowledge two mothers that are here as part of the Enough is Enough rally to make sure that government hears their voices and their families’ voices around the need for autistic funding for their families and so many families like them in British Columbia. Will the House please make welcome Diane Pearce and Stacy Wallwork.
M. Bernier: Unlike my colleague from a few members ago that spoke, I’m actually doing what I can to catch up to the member for Shuswap. I’m very excited for my son Trevor and daughter-in-law Katelyn, who also just had my fourth grandchild, Kian Robert Douglas Bernier. If the House would please help me congratulate them.
J. Tegart: I’m here to complete the secret. You might have grandchildren, but I have a great-grandchild, proud to welcome my first great-grandchild. What’s his name? Beckett. I am a great-grandmother. Beckett Kellington, who today weighs in at 14 pounds — two months old.
Welcome, Beckett, to the world.
Introduction and
First Reading of Bills
BILL 2 — MUNICIPALITIES ENABLING
AND VALIDATING
(No. 4)
AMENDMENT ACT,
2022
Hon. J. Osborne presented a message from Her Honour the Lieutenant-Governor: a bill intituled Municipalities Enabling and Validating (No. 4) Amendment Act, 2022.
Hon. J. Osborne: I move that the bill be introduced and read a first time now.
I’m pleased to introduce Bill 2. This bill amends the Municipalities Enabling and Validating (No. 4) Amendment Act, 2022, or MEVA. These amendments are intended to support the village of Lytton with their recovery process.
As members are all aware, the village suffered a devastating fire on June 30, 2021. As a result of the fire, the village lost many of their records and server backups, including copies of bylaws needed for governance and administration. The amendments being introduced today will support the village as they rebuild their suite of bylaws that were destroyed in the fire.
Specifically, these amendments will support the village by validating the repeal and replacement of bylaws that were lost during the fire; enabling the Lieutenant-Governor-in-Council to waive, modify or exempt specific legislative requirements by regulation for lost bylaws on a case-by-case basis and at the request of the village; and, if necessary, validating actions or decisions of the village that they may have taken in relation to a lost bylaw, as long as the actions or decisions were not taken in bad faith.
Our government is listening to the needs of the village of Lytton, and we are working closely with them to provide tools so they can recover following the fire. The amendments to the MEVA are required to address the unique circumstances that are faced by the village of Lytton.
These amendments will assist the village in moving forward with the recovery process by enabling council to take steps to re-establish a full suite of bylaws to support governance and administration of the village.
As the Minister of Municipal Affairs, I’m pleased to table these amendments today, which respond to the needs of the village of Lytton.
Mr. Speaker: Members, the question is the first reading of the bill.
Motion approved.
Hon. J. Osborne: I move that the bill be placed on the orders of the day for second reading at the next sitting of the House after today.
Bill 2, Municipalities Enabling and Validating (No. 4) Amendment Act, 2022, introduced, read a first time and ordered to be placed on orders of the day for second reading at the next sitting of the House after today.
Statements
(Standing Order 25B)
FRENCH CREEK ESTUARY PRESERVATION
A. Walker: Midway between Parksville and Qualicum Beach is a stream we know today as French Creek. Let me share with the House the important work underway to preserve its important estuary.
The Pəntl’áč people know this creek as swáxlhu7lh, which means “a place of many coho.” For countless generations, this beautiful space at the mouth of the creek was the site of a thriving village, a place of culture, of commerce and in balance with nature.
When I spoke to biologist Dave Clough about the estuary, he told me of his more than 40 years of working in this watershed. He shared that it was the passionate work of volunteers Herman Vanderbyl, Pepper McLeod and Marion Baker, early champions of habitat in French Creek, that inspired him to become a professional biologist.
Dave said this estuary is an absolutely unique environmental area that is seldom seen on the east coast of Vancouver Island. When you connect the dots from the estuary upstream to Hamilton marsh and all the way to the top of Mount Arrowsmith, you find a largely undeveloped ribbon of habitat, despite its close proximity to our local communities.
Every salmon that comes out of French Creek has to live in this estuary. The salmon help support the ecosystems, from the crabs to the bears to the eagles.
The preservation of this important habitat led the Save Estuary Land and Friends of French Creek Conservation societies to team up to try to raise half a million dollars to protect this 23-acre site and to create Vancouver Island’s first eagle sanctuary. These societies are already halfway to their goal of $1 million, including a generous donation of $28,000 from the 100+ Women Who Care society.
This project brings our community together around a common cause. It will inspire future generations to follow their environmental preservation, and it will protect a rare and fragile ecosystem.
Would the House please join with me in celebrating the tremendous efforts of all of these hard-working people.
LUNAR NEW YEAR CELEBRATIONS
T. Wat: You have probably noticed my shirt this afternoon. I’m wearing it today to honour the lunar new year and to help bring all of us good luck and good fortune, including the Canucks.
On February 1, Asian communities across B.C. joined the more than two billion people around the world who celebrate the lunar new year every year and welcome in the Year of the Tiger. Although the traditions and celebrations vary, the overall message stays the same.
This is a time of renewal, a time to give thanks, to prepare for the challenges ahead and to celebrate the successes of the year behind us, to join with friends and families and wish prosperity and good fortune to those around us.
While the celebrations are usually capped off with parades, fireworks and family gatherings, the COVID-19 pandemic has meant that many of these activities have had to be cancelled or reduced in scope. Nevertheless, Asian-Canadian community associations around the province have gone above and beyond to hold virtual celebrations and events.
Organizations like our own Vancouver Canucks have also found incredible ways to honour the lunar new year. They had designer Trevor Lai create the limited-edition lunar new year jersey. After being worn by the players during warm-ups, the jerseys were put up for auction, where some of the proceeds from this and other lunar new year merchandise sales were donated to the Elimin8hate campaign.
These incredible actions by groups and organizations across the province help to honour our diverse multicultural communities and have helped bring in the spirit of charity and kindness that is so important in the lunar new year.
From my family, and our B.C. Liberal caucus family, to yours, I wish you all good health, happiness, good luck and prosperity in the Year of the Tiger.
Gung hey fat choy.
Gong xi fa cai.
Foo Nin Gat Cheung.
Wan Shi Ru Yi.
Thank you. Duo Jie. Xie.
[Transliteration provided by T. Wat.]
CATHERINE LUDGATE
N. Sharma: Today I rise to acknowledge the loss of Catherine Ludgate and send our thoughts to her family and friends. Catherine will be remembered for the impact she made on the lives of some of the most vulnerable people in our province through her community leadership, her ability to ask hard questions and commitment to advocating for disadvantaged people in B.C. and Canada.
Her work contributed to B.C. and Canada’s first poverty reduction strategies. She served with great integrity and commitment as chair of the Poverty Reduction Advisory Committee, the poverty reduction advisory forum and the Canadian Ministerial Advisory Committee on Poverty.
Catherine worked at Vancity for 14 years, most recently as a senior manager for community investment and economic inclusion. This is where I had the privilege of seeing her dedication, creativity and drive firsthand. Through her work, Catherine was persistent in pushing government to rethink how we approach social services. It is no small task to bring together 13 people with different backgrounds and have them work as a cohesive unit to advise on some of the most challenging issues our province faces.
In 2020, Catherine tragically shared with the ministry staff that she was diagnosed with a terminal illness. But she was eager and willing to continue chairing the committee as long as she could, because that is who Catherine was.
For those of you who knew Catherine, I encourage you to make a donation in Catherine’s name to the welcome centre at the Immigrant Services Society of B.C. The centre serves over 600 people a day and provides a variety of crucial services for vulnerable populations.
Rest in peace, Catherine. Your impact on the lives of British Columbians will be felt for years to come.
BURIAL SITE OF INDIGENOUS CHILDREN
AT WILLIAMS LAKE
RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL
L. Doerkson: Today I rise with a heavy heart as I recognize a significant and somber discovery in my community.
Just a few weeks ago the Williams Lake First Nation announced the results from the first phase of their investigation of the lands surrounding the site of the former St. Joseph’s Mission Residential School. Tragically, their work uncovered evidence of 93 potential burial sites, each representing lives that were cut short.
It was an emotional moment to be present in the gymnasium at the Williams Lake First Nation as they made their announcement, surrounded by survivors of the St. Joseph Mission and their families. I heard the stories of what generations of students had to endure every single day at the mission, further examples of the terrible legacy of residential schools and the pain and the loss they have caused for Indigenous people across our country.
As leaders in British Columbia, we cannot hide from or ignore this dark legacy. Instead, we must all take action and work together toward a better future. We cannot let the injustice that allowed this to happen in the first place continue. That continues to impact generations of Indigenous families in so many ways. In this chamber, we must reaffirm our steadfast commitment to meaningful reconciliation, and as a society, we must genuinely listen to survivors and their families better than we have ever listened before.
Importantly, we can never forget the children who lost their lives. Each death is an irreplaceable loss, the loss of a person who was loved, who mattered, who deserved a long, free and equal life but had it taken from them.
BROOKSWOOD SECONDARY
SCHOOL
STUDENTS
A. Mercier: I recently had the pleasure, in December, of attending a few Brookswood Secondary School classes in my constituency of Langley, notably Katie Glover’s and Katie Tressel’s grades 10, 11 and 12 political studies, social studies and economics classes.
I will confess that I made a rookie mistake that I don’t think would befall any senior member of this House. I was trying to talk to these students about getting involved in politics and getting involved on the issues you care about, irrespective of the party or where you stand. I found myself asking them: how old do you guys think I am?
I realized my error when the first student, who I think was a grade 10, shouted out: “Sixty.” Then I got a chorus of guesses around that age mark. It quickly dawned on me that maybe I wasn’t asking the right question. I’m 36, for the record. I don’t even have grandchildren. I think I made my point.
They asked some great questions about hospital staffing and nursing, about taxes on vaping. There was a whole discussion between two of the students about nuclear power. I’m not sure how applicable that is to the province of British Columbia, but they were interested. ICBC and gas prices, housing. The excitement around SkyTrain to Langley with young people in Langley is palpable. We had probably a half-hour conversation about everything to do with SkyTrain.
I also got asked the same question I always get asked when I speak to young people. I don’t know why I get asked this. I think it’s out of a sense of irony. What hair product do I use? I’ll cut the suspense. I buy whatever is on sale at Shoppers. I was also asked what my biggest regret is, and I still don’t know if I have an answer to that.
I just want to give a shoutout to the kids at Brookswood and especially to the teachers, Katie Glover and Katie Tressel, because they’re doing something right.
BLACK HISTORY MONTH
C. Oakes: Today I rise to lend my voice toward an important push for diversity, inclusion and awareness. I’m speaking of Black History Month.
This February is an important opportunity to honour and recognize the significant accomplishments and contributions to our province by the people of African descent. Throughout our history, Black Canadians have played vital roles in building our province and country, all while facing racism and discrimination in their daily lives.
I believe it is our collective responsibility to raise Black voices and to learn Black stories, stories like that of Eleanor Collins, Vancouver’s first lady of jazz. She was the first Canadian woman to have her own national television show, CBC TV’s The Eleanor Show. She championed the values of equality and acceptance and is considered a civic leader and pioneer in the development of British Columbia’s music industry.
Importantly for this chamber, the hon. Rosemary Brown was the first Black woman to be elected to a provincial legislature in Canada. Representing the constituency of Vancouver-Burrard, she was elected as a member to sit in this chamber in 1972. During her 14 years as an MLA, Brown introduced legislation to remove sexism and racism from the B.C. education curriculum, to reduce discrimination based on gender or marital status and to advance human rights in British Columbia.
This year’s theme is “February and forever,” celebrating Black history today and every day. It is with that focus we continue to recognize and celebrate Black Canadians.
It’s equally significant that not just in this month we continue to advocate and work together to ensure that all people who call this land home, regardless of their background or ethnicity, have equal opportunities to succeed right here in British Columbia.
Ministerial Statements
CHIEF DELGAMUUKW
Hon. N. Cullen: It is my distinct honour and privilege today to rise to pay tribute to a truly great man. Earl Muldon, who long held the hereditary name of Delgamuukw, passed away on January 3 at the age of 85, at his home in Hazelton in Gitxsan territory.
As I sat with my boys on a cold northern highway to watch the funeral procession go by, I struggled to explain to them the importance that this man held for so many people. Earl was a legendary artist, leader and Indigenous rights activist, inspiring some of the greatest changes to Canadian and international law with respect to Indigenous rights and title. He was a generous and magnificent storyteller and keeper of Gitxsan tradition.
I had the incredible privilege of sitting and listening to many of those stories at feasts and at his home. He was humble, charitable and courageous.
He was born in Kispiox in 1936 and worked as a logger with his father, but he eventually turned to a life as an artist and became a world-renowned carver. Many of his works you can see around our province and around the world.
The high name of Delgamuukw of Wilp Delgamuukw was bestowed on Earl on April 12 in 1990, following in the footsteps of the late Albert Tait and his brother Kenny. When he stood with Gisday’wa, the late Alfred Joseph of the Wet’suwet’en Nation, in the landmark case of Delgamuukw v. the Queen, he won not only a historic victory for the Gitxsan and all Indigenous people but, many would argue, for all people of this province and country.
Earl is survived by his remarkable wife of 63 years, Shirley; his children Cheryl, Brian, Charlie and Teri; and his many grandchildren and great-grandchildren. Earl Muldon was loved and admired by many, and many, many more that he never knew or met.
On behalf of the Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation, our government and this entire Legislature, I would like to extend our deepest condolences to his family and his nation and appreciation for an incredible life well lived.
M. Lee: I also rise on behalf of the official opposition to pay tribute to Chief Delgamuukw.
On January 3, 2022, our nation lost a very important individual who played a critical role in helping to transform Canada’s legal system.
Chief Delgamuukw was a longtime Gitxsan Hereditary Chief who was influential in confirming Aboriginal rights and title in British Columbia. His courage and resilience changed the way Canadians understand Indigenous rights, and his work has paved the way for generations in protecting their rights.
As the member opposite has said, Chief Delgamuukw was a renowned carver and artist who preserved and sought to preserve Gitxsan form and culture.
I must say, on a personal note, that I understand Earl Muldon was studying at university in the 1950s in Vancouver, and the reason why he left was the intense forms of racism that he experienced personally. My own father, when he came from Hong Kong in 1953, also experienced, like many others, forms of racism. Chief Delgamuukw went back and formed the Gitxsan School of Art, where he passed on the culture, the art, the carving to generations, to the children and grandchildren to come.
What he was anchored on in terms of the importance of culture to his people forms the foundation, of course, for that landmark case. When I became a lawyer in 1997, two months later the Supreme Court of Canada issued its decision — the importance of oral history, tradition and culture for Indigenous peoples, the importance of understanding how that is shaping their traditional lands and rights and title.
I know his artistic works, of course, are found all over British Columbia, including on the doors of the Museum of Anthropology at UBC, which we all come to see. His accomplishments and dedication to his community will truly be felt for many generations yet to come.
On behalf of the official opposition, we raise our hands to Chief Delgamuukw and offer our condolences to his family, clan and his people. We wish Chief Delgamuukw a light heart on his new journey.
Mr. Speaker: Member for Saanich North and the Islands.
A. Olsen: HÍSW̱ḴE SIÁM, Mr. Speaker.
I’d like to thank the minister of state for his comments and the member for Vancouver-Langara for his comments as well.
Today I stand to pay tribute and acknowledge the life and accomplishments of the Gitxsan late Hereditary Chief Delgamuukw, also known as Earl Muldon.
The late Chief Delgamuukw was a world-famous Gitxsan artist who received a B.C. lifetime achievement award for Aboriginal art in 2009 and was appointed to the Order of Canada in 2010.
That name, Delgamuukw, will be familiar to Canadians because it is also the name of that landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision in 1997 known as the Delgamuukw-Gisday’wa case that was to affirm Aboriginal title in British Columbia.
In addition, this decision also affirmed the use of oral testimony of Indigenous leaders, a form of evidence that is very well known to me, as it was used by my father and his legal team in the early 2000s to successfully defend his rights against this provincial government — also at the Supreme Court of Canada. The Supreme Court found that the Aboriginal title encompasses the right to exclusive use and occupation of the land.
I raise my hands in gratitude to Chief Delgamuukw, Chief Gisday’wa and all the Hereditary Chiefs of the Gitxsan and Wet’suwet’en for their commitment to standing up to the injustices that are at the core of these Crown governments.
For 13 years, Chief Delgamuukw, Chief Gisday’wa and their fellow Hereditary Chiefs fought for the jurisdiction of their territories in northwest British Columbia. They originally launched their case in 1984, and in 1991, they heard the ruling of the B.C. Supreme Court, which stated that while First Nations might have had rights, they were legally extinguished when British Columbia joined Canada in 1871.
I and many Indigenous peoples in British Columbia are grateful to Chief Delgamuukw for not being dissuaded by the gross and racist treatment of our B.C. court. A report I read outlined Chief Justice McEachern, who described the pre-contact life of the Gitxsan and Wet’suwet’en as “nasty, brutish and short,” while ignoring Indigenous systems of governance that existed on the land since time immemorial and devaluing Indigenous cultures by saying: “They more likely acted as they did because of survival instincts.”
Despite these awful, racist comments and this unjust treatment, Chief Delgamuukw continued to demand justice for his people. As a result, all Indigenous people, including the W̱SÁNEĆ, where I’m from, now know that Aboriginal title has not been extinguished. It exists. It is meaningful. Oral testimony is legitimate. Indigenous rights include land but also the economic value that can be derived from the land.
Here we stand in this chamber, 25 years later from that ruling, celebrating and honouring the memory of a man who honourably carried that name, Delgamuukw, and all the responsibilities that come associated with carrying a name such as that.
I must ask the question. I must ask the question now. Has this institution honoured that work over this 25 years? In some respects, I think the answer is yes. We have a new law, the Declaration Act, which can fundamentally change the Indigenous-Crown relationship, and that change is happening slowly.
However, this government continues to use instruments entrenched in that old thinking, the thinking that was used by the B.C. court — arguments such as terra nullius and the doctrine of discovery — and is still used by legal teams representing this institution where we celebrate Chief Delgamuukw, still using those tools to this day. There continues to be conflict on the land based in the northwest of British Columbia. The protests and armed police enforcement continue to this day, even though ministers of this Crown government were contracted to meaningfully dispense that 25-year-old decision.
In the spirit of the struggle, I’m confident that Chiefs Delgamuukw and Gisday’wa, the late Chiefs Delgamuukw and Gisday’wa, and their colleagues did not withstand the racism and abuse fighting for decades in court for these rights to be acknowledged by this Crown government so that 25 years later the same government — with some of the same faces, just in different seats at the table — will still be struggling to uphold the basic findings of the work that Chief Delgamuukw, Chief Gisday’wa and their fellow Hereditary Chiefs fought so hard for.
I appreciate this moment and this opportunity to highlight the incredible courage and power of Chief Delgamuukw, and I raise my hands in gratitude for the courage and dedication that he showed.
Our thoughts of the B.C. Green caucus and prayers remain for strength to the family of Chief Delgamuukw.
HÍSW̱ḴE SIÁM.
Oral Questions
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
TO OVERDOSE
DEATHS
S. Bond: Well, it is another devastating, heartbreaking day in British Columbia. The overdose numbers that were released today by the coroner confirm that 2,224 people lost their lives last year alone, more than six people every single day. That is a 25 percent increase over the previous year.
Every month the numbers get worse and worse and worse, and there is no real action to halt the deaths. Chief coroner Lisa Lapointe says: “Our province is in a worse place than it has ever been.”
Will the minister admit today that she has utterly failed in the primary goal of saving lives in British Columbia?
Hon. J. Horgan: I, too, want to acknowledge with sorrow the findings of the coroner and the loss of over 2,000 British Columbians to a toxic drug supply. We have been discussing this issue in this Legislature for coming on half a decade and more.
On both sides of this House, there is a sense of loss of people in our community who have succumbed to addictions and have been taken down by a drug supply that is more toxic today than it has ever been — also part and parcel of the findings of the coroner.
Although there is much more work to do, I think it’s also important to acknowledge that all of us, collectively, have been passing legislation in this House, working to ensure that budgets are increased, year over year — $500 million last year — so that we can double the number of treatment beds for youth and we can put over 195 treatment beds for adults in place as well as building on the work that has been going on since the advent of our first public health crisis, that of a toxic drug supply.
What startles me — and I think what we’ve all been grappling with, wherever we sit, whoever we represent — is that the vast majority of fatalities have been males between the ages of 30 and 59. There is a perception — and all of us know that this isn’t correct — that this is a Vancouver problem, a part of Vancouver problem. It is not. It is a British Columbia problem. It is a national problem.
What we have been trying to do — and in many times, with the assistance of members on the other side — is to make appeals to the federal government so that they can build on the safe supply work that we have done here to increase to some 12,000 citizens that are being able to access safe supply to meet the demand, which is estimated by some to be 50,000 and others to be 150,000 people who require access to that safe drug supply.
I also want to, while I’m on my feet — and I think there will be unanimity to this — just condemn those who prey on the vulnerabilities of others, those who are making a fortune out of bringing fentanyl and other toxic drugs into our system with no regard whatsoever for the consequences of that action.
On the second of February, the RCMP announced a bust in Coquitlam — five people charged. The RCMP seized not just firearms and over $1 million in cash but three kilograms of fentanyl. We know a grain of fentanyl can kill you, and someone in British Columbia thought it was okay to allow these people to conduct their business.
We will not say anything today other than we applaud the work of those on the front lines who are resuscitating people with those tools we do have and working to make sure that we get a destigmatized system in place here that’s part and parcel of decriminalization as well as a safe drug supply. We also have to track down those predators in our society that are killing people every day because they don’t give a darn. I know everyone in this place does.
Mr. Speaker: Leader of the Official Opposition, supplemental question.
S. Bond: I don’t think there’s a single person in this chamber that would disagree that people on the front lines are working hard and doing their part every single day. But it’s time for this government and this Premier to step up and do their part.
Six people every day are dying in our province.
I’m heartened to hear the Premier speak about working collectively, because numerous times the leader of the Green Party and the Leader of the Official Opposition have asked this Premier to do the right thing — to bring the Health Committee back to do its work across party lines. We continue to ask for that today.
For the life of me, I cannot understand why that is stubbornly refused. Back in 2017, this Premier said: “Think of wildfires. We never wait to check the budget before putting the fires out. We get at it right away.” Yet month after month after month here in British Columbia, record numbers of people dying, and the ministry responsible for working on that program has a budget smaller than the Premier’s office.
The chief coroner puts it simply: “It’s not a lack of desire or motivation on the backs of the people who are using. It’s just that there are no services. The services are so very, very limited.”
Will the Premier stand up today and make a commitment to British Columbians that he will bring the parties to the table to work together and finally begin to try to mitigate the devastating stories that we hear month after month?
Hon. J. Horgan: Again, I thank the Leader of the Official Opposition for raising these important issues.
It is important to know that when the opposition says the office budget for Minister X or Y is bigger than someone else’s, it completely disregards the fact that the services that she speaks of, that have been increased year over year, are funded through health authorities, with $500 million more going into mental health and addictions work over the past five years, putting in place an innovation that did not exist before we arrived — that is, having complex care housing for those who are clearly not getting the services that the member speaks to.
We need to make sure we’re building the tools so that front-line workers who have been struck by COVID and the challenges that that entails, meaning that people are separate from each other, oftentimes dying alone — again, a finding by the coroner.
There has not been one fatality in a harm reduction facility. That’s part and parcel of the model that I think we all support — making sure we’re protecting people when they’re most vulnerable, making sure that the supply of drugs that they are accessing is safe. We’re working on that, we’ll continue to work on that, and I know we’ll have the support of the Leader of the Opposition.
T. Halford: Six people a day. A death rate that has doubled since 2016. The minister’s response always seems to be the same. We need to do better. Today the chief coroner says: “An abject and very costly failure.”
These are people’s lives, and they need action now. They needed it in 2021. They needed it in 2020. The coroner says this. She said this last year: “The fact that we haven’t seen a coordinated response to, in a very big way, reduce these numbers of deaths is just sad. It’s heartbreaking.”
To the minister, how can she defend this catastrophic failure that the coroner continues to outline month after month?
Hon. S. Malcolmson: The devastating losses across British Columbia are felt by those on the front line, by the families, by our government, by our caucus. That the increasingly toxic drug supply, particularly exacerbated by the effects of the pandemic, has led to such a tragically and terribly increased loss of life is something that spurs our work every day and something that strengthens our resolve to continue to invest more, continue to build more.
I’ll remind the member opposite that in 2017, the public health emergency was already underway, but there was not a continuum of care. This has been widely identified. We have been working simultaneously as a health care system and as a government to both fight the public health emergency and build that system of care.
Although I agree with the member’s characterization of the unacceptable loss of life, and clearly we have to do more, I do not agree in any way that no steps have been taken. British Columbia has already added several hundred new addictions treatment beds, and we are building several hundred more. We have already added 20 youth treatment beds just in the year 2020 and another 30 in the year 2021, with more to come.
Integrated child and youth teams coming across the province. From one supervised consumption site in 2016 to 42 today. Sixteen of those inhalation sites we’re innovating across the continuum.
We are determined to do more. Clearly, more is needed to be done. But British Columbia, as a province, and people on the front line are tackling this crisis from every angle, from a multitude of approaches across the continuum, both prevention and treatment, and we’re determined to do more.
Mr. Speaker: Member for Surrey–White Rock, supplemental.
T. Halford: It’s simply not good enough. It isn’t 2017; it’s 2022. This minister and this government have had over four years to put things in place that will combat this crisis.
When it comes to recovery, it’s a failure. It’s a failure to provide the support that this province needs. No one should be forced to choose between recovery and paying their rent. No one should be forced to provide costs for counselling and putting food on their table for their family.
The coroner says: “Greater access to evidence-based treatment and recovery programs is also urgently needed. People are dying on waiting lists. There are barriers everywhere.”
Will this minister today get up in this House and commit to take the necessary steps to make sure that individuals that are struggling, that are fighting addiction have access to recovery, have access to treatment in real time so we do not have people waiting, dying on wait-lists, so we don’t have moms and fathers choosing whether or not they are going to remortgage their house to provide treatment for their child? Can this minister make that commitment today — that this government will support affordable recovery?
Hon. S. Malcolmson: The expansion of addiction and recovery treatment beds in British Columbia is unprecedented, and more is needed. The addition of another $132 million that we announced this fall to fill gaps in the treatment recovery system, meeting people where they are in their recovery journey, whether it’s care before detox, whether it’s the step in between detox and treatment where people often fall through the cracks, whether it’s after leaving treatment, having the post-recovery counselling and community support.
People on the front line, people with lived experience, have told us these are the gaps in the continuum of care that we are building up every day.
I agree with the member. More needs to be done. That’s why we have already funded it in last year’s budget. That’s why we are working every day to implement that budget and to build out that continuum of care.
More needs to be done. There is no question. The loss of life is testament to that. Our government’s commitment to continue to build out that system of health care response to the overdose crisis continues in every way.
Anybody listening, I want you to know that every week we are adding new supports. In the weeks and months ahead, you will see announcements again and again in every part of the province, building that system of care that should have been in place to care for people and to finally bring an end to this overdose crisis.
COVID-19 TRANSMISSION AND
FACE MASKS IN HEALTH CARE
FACILITIES
S. Furstenau: I’m going to follow the lead of the Canadian women’s hockey team and keep my N95 mask on for these proceedings.
I want to echo the words of the Leader of the Opposition. On behalf of our caucus, we are very happy to see the Premier back and well and doing his job.
Thank you very much, Premier, for your strength. We are very happy to see you well again.
More than ever, we need governments that the public feel confident about, and I’m afraid that we’re not there. People are confused by health policies. They’re confused by what is guiding directions, what the outcomes are trying to be achieved, how we are measuring success.
We have two devastating health emergencies in B.C. right now, and we need this more than ever. To restore that crucial confidence, governments have to be able to acknowledge mistakes and be willing to improve. They need to explain what is informing their decisions and how they are transparently measuring the outcomes of their policies.
Right now across B.C., patients, health care workers, teachers and others are not being provided a critical tool to protect themselves against an airborne virus, an N95 mask. Nurses in Fraser Health have filed a human rights complaint against their employer for denying them access to N95s in their workplace.
I commend the Premier and, by my count, about a dozen members of the government caucus for protecting themselves and others and wearing an N95 mask.
My question is to the Premier. Does he recognize and acknowledge that COVID-19 is an airborne virus?
Hon. A. Dix: With respect to the COVID-19 pandemic — and the member will know this — in British Columbia, our efforts in this area and in all others have been guided by the science and guided by an outstanding team of public health leaders led by Dr. Bonnie Henry, an internationally regarded expert in these areas. Her position in B.C. is enshrined in statute to provide independent advice to the government.
With respect to mask-wearing in B.C., the strength of that approach has been, over the course of the pandemic, to adapt to the science and the circumstances, something Dr. Henry has consistently done — and why, overwhelmingly in B.C., people have supported that effort. They know it’s based on the evidence, and they know it’s based on the best counsel and will continue to be.
With respect to PPEs in general and N95 masks in particular, part of my task has been to ensure, with the health care system, that people have the masks in the health care system that are required, where they’re required, to protect themselves and to protect their patients. That has happened. We built an inventory, for example, in the health care system, of 7.7 million N95 masks to do so.
Our work and our guidance will continue to be based, as they have been from the beginning, on the advice of public health professionals, on Dr. Henry and her team, an internationally regarded group of experts.
Mr. Speaker: Leader of the Third Party, supplemental.
S. Furstenau: Thank you to the minister. However, he invokes “internationally regarded….”
The WHO has acknowledged that COVID is airborne. The Canadian Public Health Agency has acknowledged that COVID is airborne and has recommended that people wear N95 masks. We are internationally regarded, at this moment, as being out of line with a lot of the consensus around airborne transmission.
People are being told they cannot wear their own N95 masks into health facilities in this province. Yesterday the B.C. Children’s Hospital was tweeting that N95 is not an airborne virus…. This is on top of many statements being made by public health authorities in this province, doubling down on droplet transmission of this virus.
My question, again, is to the Minister of Health. Why will he not stand up and acknowledge that this is an airborne virus and the best protection that people can have…? In this room, 100 percent of people are vaccinated, and we are all wearing masks, doing the right thing to reduce transmission of this virus. We need the leadership to recognize it’s time to acknowledge this is an airborne virus.
Hon. A. Dix: Dr. Henry and I — in particular, Dr. Henry but also Dr. Gustafson and our teams of experts at the BCCDC — have briefed on the question of transmission repeatedly over the last two years, including on this precise issue of transmission. We’ve put in place a set of protections for people, layers of protection that allow them to be as safe as possible in the context of a global pandemic.
The member talks about international comparisons. Well, an important international comparison is the fact that British Columbia — this isn’t Dr. Henry; it’s not me; it’s not the Premier; it’s not the government; it’s all of us — has one of the highest levels of vaccination in the world, here in British Columbia, one of the highest levels of compliance with public health guidance. That is, I think, pretty significant.
We have — and this is our success, all the members of the Legislature, all the people of B.C. — one of the lowest levels of mortality in comparable jurisdictions anywhere in the world. That’s because Dr. Henry is giving clear advice based on the evidence, and I think the people of B.C., to an enormous degree, have followed and supported that effort because they want to keep each other safe as well.
SERVICE MODEL CHANGE
FOR CHILDREN WITH SUPPORT NEEDS
AND FUNDING FOR AUTISM SERVICES
K. Kirkpatrick: When we were last in this House, we raised story after story about parents of neurodiverse children who were anxious, angry, upset about the NDP clawback of autism funding. Months later those parents have continued…. In fact, they were on the Legislature lawn earlier today and in the gallery today to send a message to this government.
Monica Nunez from Langford says: “As a parent of a child with autism, I am not only infuriated, but I am scared for my child’s future. If government truly wants to help all children, they will reconsider the move to eliminate autism funding.”
Will the minister today listen to Monica and the other parents that are in the gallery here and reverse this heartless clawback?
Hon. M. Dean: Thank you to the member for the question.
Thank you to the parents for being here today as well.
For many years, my ministry has been hearing from families that their children have been left behind. There’s a patchwork of programs that are available for some of the community of children and youth with support needs.
We did consultation in 2019 with over 1,500 individuals. Just in the month of December last year alone, we engaged with about 850 families as well. It is important to listen to families. We are actively doing that. The next sessions of engagement with families start on February 28.
We’re committed to listening to families and to making this transformation as successful as it can possibly be for the children and youth in our province. We are committed to working with families to make it right and to make sure that all children and youth receive the services for their unique needs as early as possible.
Mr. Speaker: Member for West Vancouver–Capilano, supplemental.
K. Kirkpatrick: Groundhog Day was last week, but I feel that it is today. We continue to get the same answer to different questions, and it’s never a real answer. The NDP’s cold-hearted clawback affects all neurodiverse children. The minister is ignoring this broad coalition opposed to her clawback. She is ignoring the parents in the gallery today. She’s even ignoring her friends, her political allies.
The president of the BCTF said this morning: “It’s heartbreaking to think that government would knowingly subject disabled students to significant emotional, physical and psychological distress. It’s time for government to listen.”
Will the minister listen to parents, listen to the BCTF and stop the clawback?
Hon. M. Dean: Thank you to the member for the question.
It is very important to listen to people with expertise and with experience and with knowledge, and for many years, the ministry has been listening.
Interjections.
Mr. Speaker: Members.
Hon. M. Dean: The ministry has been listening to families and to advocates and to very experienced service providers as well. The community of children and youth with support needs is diverse. So are the people who serve them as well. We need to listen to them and to be working very closely with them, which is what we are doing.
Just in December of last year, we had engagement sessions with over 2,000 people from families and from service providers. We’re continuing that engagement as we implement this really important transformation. We’ve heard from too many families that their kids are getting left behind. We have received several reports from the Representative for Children and Youth, the independent representative for children, telling us that we need to move to a needs-based system, and that is what we’re doing.
There was an all-party select standing committee of this Legislative Assembly that wrote a recommendation that we should be moving to a system of needs-based services. What that means is that children get supports…
Interjections.
Mr. Speaker: Members.
Hon. M. Dean: …when they need them. Children need supports as early as possible, not locked behind a diagnosis, in order to have a successful developmental path.
P. Milobar: It’s very clearly the minister that is not listening and failing to communicate with these parents, failing to talk with them and failing to engage with them in any way. In fact, this is likely the closest most of these parents will ever get to actually feeling like they’ve had any discussion or communication with this minister.
The minister’s false attempt at division is disrespectful to the broad coalition of neurodiverse children and their families who are speaking out against her decision. Absolutely nobody recommended clawing back individualized funding, but that is what this NDP government has chosen to do.
The message, from even their political allies like the BCTF, is clear: “Stop the planned clawback of individual funding for children with autism. Government must stop with the political pandering and do what’s right for the kids.”
Again, will the minister do what is right and stop the clawback?
Hon. M. Dean: Thank you to the member for the question.
I have heard countless stories from families. I hear from families who tell me that even if their child has a diagnosis and they have access to individualized funding, there are many families that aren’t able to find services to be able to support their child.
Many other families are burnt out. They don’t want to be a case manager for their children. They want to be able to be a parent, and they want to be supported in having services delivered and available and supports available for their children as early as possible.
Families have been asking for an increase in respite, and our government has increased respite funding. Families of children with complex needs have told me just how stressed and strained they are because of a lack of support based on need and because the current system is so fragmented. And families who live in remote communities find it really difficult to access services.
We’re working on building a system that will ensure that all families and their children will receive the services that their children need based on needs. The services will match the needs. Families and children will set goals together, and then they’ll get the supports to be able to achieve those…
Interjections.
Mr. Speaker: Members, let’s listen to the answer.
Hon. M. Dean: …goals and continue to receive those services. We are building a system that will reach into all parts of the province, deliver those services that children need as early as possible.
Mr. Speaker: Member for Kamloops–North Thompson, supplemental.
P. Milobar: Well, the minister just seemed to describe the system she’s trying to claw back and tear apart, actually.
Let’s hear from someone else that isn’t sure the minister has been listening to her. Noelle Smith from Campbell River was diagnosed with autism as a two-year-old and has overcome the trauma and stigma of being told that she would never graduate. Not only did Noelle graduate with top grades, but she is now a behavioural interventionist, supporting herself and working to help others, as a result of the individualized autism funding that this minister is now so cruelly clawing back.
Noelle has this question for the minister: “Why is it okay to remove me and other fellow workers from a child and youth who trusts us?”
Will the minister show Noelle the respect she deserves and answer Noelle’s direct question?
Hon. M. Dean: Thank you to the member for the question.
Of course, this is a really important transformation, to make sure that we get the services that are needed for families in British Columbia and get the services to them and to their children as soon as possible.
We’re engaging with families. We want to hear from families about how they envision their children being served in the new system, how we can work in partnership with them, co-create that package of services, putting the child and youth at the centre and working with the circle of care that’s so important to that child and youth, making sure that there’s a package of services that are there to meet the needs of that child.
We’re working with families and listening to families. We’re working with service providers, listening to service providers and advocates in the community as well. We’re going to continue those conversations to make sure that all children in British Columbia get the services that they need as soon as possible.
[End of question period.]
Reports from Committees
FINANCE AND GOVERNMENT
SERVICES
COMMITTEE
J. Routledge: I have the honour to present the third report of the Select Standing Committee on Finance and Government Services for the second session of the 42nd parliament, titled Annual Review of the Budgets of Statutory Offices, a copy of which has been deposited with the Office of the Clerk.
I move that the report be taken as read.
Motion approved.
J. Routledge: I ask leave of the House to move a motion to adopt the report.
Leave granted.
J. Routledge: I move that the report be adopted. In doing so, I would like to make some brief comments.
This report summarizes the committee’s recommendations for the budgets of the province’s nine statutory officers. Committee members met with each of the statutory officers last fall to review and consider their budget proposals for the 2022-2023 fiscal year. Funding lifts for the offices generally arose from expanded legislative mandates, increased caseloads and inflation related to salaries and building costs.
The committee is sensitive to the broader financial pressures facing our province as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, devastating wildfires and floods. We appreciate the statutory officers’ commitment to ongoing prudent fiscal management.
The committee will continue to encourage statutory offices to track caseload and metrics, highlight efficiencies and internal savings, and ensure their three-year budget proposals incorporate the inflationary costs, internal savings and anticipated needs as much as possible. The committee is grateful to the statutory officers for their continued dedication and work in serving all British Columbians, and we look forward to meeting with them again in the spring.
I also want to acknowledge the staff in the Parliamentary Committees Office who supported the committee. Thank you to Jennifer Arril, Jonathon Hamilton, Mary Newell, Karan Riarh and Ron Wall.
I appreciate the diligent and thoughtful work of all committee members throughout this process and particularly recognize the Deputy Chair, the member for Kelowna West, for his collaborative approach and advice.
B. Stewart: Thank you to the Chair of the Select Standing Committee on Finance and Government Services.
I just wanted to add a few comments about the opportunity to work with the member for Burnaby North and the importance of this work in meeting with the statutory officers and the roles that they play, here in the Legislature, to each and every one of us and to British Columbians.
The report introduced in the House today is a result of months of work and many interviews with the various statutory officers. I’m thankful for the thorough dialogue and discussion we had during these meetings and the thoughtful questions from members of the committee on all sides of the House and equally thoughtful answers from those we interviewed. We look forward to more productive discussions in the future, and we are planning to meet again shortly.
I have to say that the whole process of putting this report together was an enlightening experience in which we all learned more about the statutory offices and the important work that they do every day, as well as the many pressures that they face, both dealing with the COVID pandemic and the fact that there is increased, added responsibility to many of the offices. I also look forward to their creativity in finding savings in their roles in the service of British Columbians.
Last and most definitely not least, I just want to say a sincere thank-you to all the legislative staff who helped us complete this task. Without their hard work and patience, we would not have had this report today. I want to extend my sincerest thanks to Jennifer Arril, Karan Riarh, Ron Wall, Jonathon Hamilton and Mary Newell.
Mr. Speaker: Members, the question is the adoption of the report.
Motion approved.
PERSONAL INFORMATION PROTECTION
ACT REVIEW
COMMITTEE
M. Elmore: I have the honour to present the report of the Special Committee to Review the Personal Information Protection Act for the second session of the 42nd parliament, entitled Modernizing British Columbia’s Private Sector Privacy Law, a copy of which has been deposited with the Office of the Clerk.
I move that the report be taken as read and received.
Mr. Speaker: The question is that the report be taken as read and received.
Motion approved.
M. Elmore: I ask leave of the House to move a motion to adopt the report.
Leave granted.
Mr. Speaker: Please proceed.
M. Elmore: In moving adoption of the report, I’d like to make some brief comments. The Personal Information Protection Act came into force in 2004. It aims to balance the protection of individual privacy with the need of private sector and non-profit organizations to collect, use and disclose personal information responsibly in order to provide services and conduct business. The act also gives individuals the right to access their personal information and to ask that their personal information be corrected.
As we all know, new technologies have transformed the economy as well as the delivery of many services we rely on in our daily life. British Columbians’ personal information is now being collected and used in new ways, and this raises questions about the protection of their information.
Over the past two years, the committee met with stakeholders and experts who provided input on how the act is working and areas where it could be improved. They were clear that significant changes to the Personal Information Protection Act are needed. The committee’s report makes 34 recommendations to modernize the act, including aligning it with provincial, federal and international privacy legislation and strengthening safeguards to reflect the current technological landscape.
I’d like to express the committee’s sincere appreciation to everyone who took the time to provide us with input. I’d also like to thank all committee members, including the MLAs for Surrey-Guildford, Port Moody–Coquitlam, Richmond-Steveston, Vancouver-Quilchena and Saanich North and the Islands, for their hard work and dedication to the process and, in particular, the Deputy Chair, the member for Penticton.
As well, thanks to the support and hard work from legislative staff Susan Sourial, Lisa Hill, Jesse Gordon, Mary Newell, Stephanie Raymond and Mai Nguyen.
D. Ashton: Many thanks to a great Chair, the member for Vancouver-Kensington — always fair, tolerant and a very good listener.
Thank you to all the tri-party members on the committee — an important job well done. Special thanks to the member for Vancouver-Quilchena for his legal mind that did, on occasion, help us come to a compromise.
A real, heartfelt thanks to the Clerk of Committees staff — exemplary as always. This report will give the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner, specifically Commissioner Michael McEvoy, lots to work with.
In closing, this act is reviewed every six years. With the advances in technology and the use of such, I would ask that the government keep a keen eye in case a review is required earlier.
Again, thank you to all the members of the committee.
Mr. Speaker: The question is adoption of the report.
Motion approved.
Motions Without Notice
AMENDMENT TO STANDING ORDERS
FOR THURSDAY SITTING
HOURS
Hon. M. Farnworth: I seek leave to move a motion. By leave, I move:
[That, for the remainder of the current Session:
1. Standing Order 2 (1) be amended to provide for the Thursday afternoon sitting to be from 1:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. instead of 1:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
2. Standing Order 3 be amended by striking the words “6:00 p.m. on Thursday” and replacing them with “5:30 p.m. on Thursday”.]
Both opposition caucuses have been supplied a copy of the motion.
Leave granted.
Motion approved.
Question of Privilege
A. Olsen: I rise at the first opportunity to address a question of privilege and to provide evidence that last November the Minister of Citizens’ Services may have intentionally misled this House. I’m asking you, Mr. Speaker, to assess whether a prima facie breach of privilege and contempt of parliament has occurred.
I raise this issue in this House. However, this is not the first time that such allegations have been levelled against the Minister of Citizens’ Services with respect to the debate last fall over Bill 22, the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Amendment Act, 2021.
These questions, indeed, have already been raised publicly by the media, and if they are left unassessed, they have the very real consequences of eroding the confidence of this institution, in this institution. British Columbians need to know that this institution will not stand by and allow potentially harmful behaviour, or even the accusations of that behaviour, to be ignored.
Members of this House are aware that chapter 17 of Parliamentary Practice in British Columbia, fifth edition, outlines, in section 17.4, the privileges of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia. This section outlines that the Constitution Act, 1871, permits this assembly to define our own privileges, immunities and powers. “Parliamentary privilege allows the Legislative Assembly and its members to fulfil their constitutional functions — to deliberate, to legislate and to hold the government to account — without interference from the executive, judiciary and others.”
Beginning in the 14th century, these privileges have existed to some extent in our system of governance. Over the course of 300 years, these privileges evolved to protect our work in these chambers, such as it is, on behalf of our constituents. These are serious matters, and in order to preserve the integrity and dignity of our democracy, when a prima facie breach of privilege occurs, we members must raise them to you, Mr. Speaker, for your ruling on whether they require further investigation.
We, as members of this House, are afforded privileges that protect our ability to promote the best interests of our constituents within these chambers, such as the freedom of speech, the freedom from arrest and civil actions, and to regulate our own proceedings free from interference and intimidation. While our individual and collective privileges can be clearly defined, contempt of parliament is more difficult to categorize and delineate.
Chapter 3 of the House of Commons Procedure and Practice, third edition, 2017, covers privileges and immunities of members. In the section defining privilege and contempt, it states:
“Any disregard of or attack on the rights, powers and immunities of the House and its members, either by an outside person or body or by a member of the House, is referred to as a ‘breach of privilege’ and is punishable by the House. There are, however, other affronts against the dignity and authority of parliament, which may not fall within one of the specifically defined privileges. Thus, the House also claims the right to punish as a contempt any action which, though not a breach of specific privilege, tends to obstruct or impede the House in its performance of its functions, obstructs or impedes any member or officer of the House in the discharge of their duties….”
The section lists several potential types of contempt, including “deliberately attempting to mislead the House or a committee by way of statement, evidence or petition.”
Joseph Maingot writes in Parliamentary Immunity in Canada, 2016: “If someone improperly interferes with the parliamentary work of a member of parliament — i.e., any of the member’s activities that have a connection with a proceeding in parliament — that is a matter involving parliamentary privilege. An offence against the authority of the House constitutes contempt.”
It is the intentional attempt to mislead the House, the interference in our parliamentary work, that is an affront to the dignity and authority of this parliament, this House, and the obstruction of the performance of the function of this House that must be investigated further. Questions have been raised publicly by elected members and members of the legislative press gallery with respect to whether responses to questions by the Minister of Citizens’ Services at committee stage of the debate for Bill 22, the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Amendment Act, 2021, amounted to an intentional attempt to mislead this House.
If a member of the Crown intentionally misleads this House, or if allegations are made publicly that a minister intentionally misled the House, and it’s allowed to stand without further investigation, it undermines and erodes the confidence of our constituents in their members and ultimately calls into question the dignity of this institution.
It is the Speaker’s responsibility to determine whether a prima facie breach has occurred. Quoting from Parliamentary Practice in British Columbia:
“Once the Speaker has come to a decision based on the evidence presented, the Speaker’s decision is presented to the Legislative Assembly. There are two possible outcomes: that no prima facie breach of privilege occurred, in which case the matter is closed, or that a prima facie breach of privilege occurred. In the latter instance, the Speaker will leave it to the Legislative Assembly to vote on a motion to have the matter examined by a parliamentary committee, or, more rarely, to take corrective steps immediately.”
I have prepared a motion that I’m prepared to move, should Mr. Speaker find a prima facie breach of privilege has occurred, referring this issue to the Select Standing Committee on Parliamentary Reform, Ethical Conduct, Standing Orders and Private Bills for further investigation.
I take no joy in standing here today, raising this allegation in this House. However, it is a responsibility that I accept as part of maintaining the dignity of our democratic institution of government. The question I and other members of this House had as the fall 2021 legislative session was adjourned was whether the Minister of Citizens’ Services had intentionally misled this House through the debate of Bill 22.
I was not the only one with this question. At least two articles were written by members of the legislative press gallery raising concerns about the conduct of the Minister of Citizens’ Services, specifically in regards to creating the power for an application fee to be set through regulation.
There are several instances during the debate where the Minister of Citizens’ Services was asked about the potential for an application fee. There are dozens of pages of exchanges between members of the opposition and the minister. Questions about the proposed new fee arose almost immediately in the debate that lasted until the final moments of the fall sitting of the House. I will note that for most of the questions, the minister stated that the clause being debated did not apply to the proposed fee, as the legislation was only creating the power to create an application fee, while the actual fee was set in regulation.
Starting in early November and continuing throughout the debate, the Minister of Citizens’ Services suggested to British Columbians that there would be more analysis and further consultation on a potential fee. On November 1, the minister said the legislation “doesn’t outline a fee or what the fee is or how the fee is going to work. What this legislation does is give the government the ability to create that fee.” That fee will be decided in regulation, going through “the analysis of what a fee should and could look like.”
The minister continued: “At no point in this section or anywhere through this legislation are we going to discuss a number of what the fee will be, because that’s set through regulation…. It will be set in regulation at a later date.”
On November 3, the minister stated: “I think it’s important for everyone to know that in making those regulations moving forward, that we are listening and that we will continue to listen to British Columbians.”
To this, the member for Abbotsford West responded that the minister was in essence saying: “We want you to grant us this power, but I refuse to engage in a discussion about how we might use that power…. That’s antidemocratic.”
These are the types of statements and reassurances that the minister provided British Columbians repeatedly through the month-long debate. The minister consistently led British Columbians to believe that there would be further consultation and engagement on a potential fee. As the debate continues, the minister reinforced her message:
“I know the member wants to share his views and the concerns of British Columbians around a potential fee, and I welcome that. Our government is listening. I am listening. I think it’s very important to hear that feedback on what a potential fee should be. I thank the member for his interventions in clause 1 and in sharing that information. I thank everyone who has written to my office to share their thoughts, because our government is listening. That will be taken into account, and I thank you.”
All of those quotes come from debates in early November. The assembly continued to sit and debate legislation until November 25, under the assumption that the minister and her staff were listening to the public feedback. These debates clearly show the Minister of Citizens’ Services repeatedly deflecting questions about the specific fee that would be set, and would only engage in questions about the right this bill was giving the government to set a fee through regulation — a process only granted to her and the executive by the passing of the bill, by the power of this Legislative Assembly.
Members of the opposition push hard in the committee stage of the debate to fully understand the implications of the powers we are granting to the minister and the executive, and that is why it is so critical that the executive does not interfere or obstruct in the privileges of the members by not answering questions or intentionally misleading the House.
When a member of the executive of our government is questioned about their intentions and they reassure our constituents that they will be consulted, the members of this House must be confident that those commitments will indeed happen.
Well, the minister may defend the earlier commitments of further consultation as the government no doubt heard feedback all through November. The minister continued to make commitments right up to the adjournment of the debate of Bill 22. Just minutes before it received final approval and royal assent, British Columbians were led to believe that there was time following enactment to provide their input on a “potential fee that may be set through regulation.”
The minister stated in the final minutes of that debate on the final day: “As I’ve said before, and as I know the member knows I’m going to answer, the legislation before us today gives the ability to create the fee. The details of the regulation are through the regulation process, which is separate from the legislation. But the member raises good points, and as I’ve said to the member all throughout this legislation, we are listening, and I thank the member for raising the concern.”
Now, the assembly adjourned shortly after 5 p.m. on November 25. On November 26, an order of the Lieutenant-Governor-in-Council was published setting a new freedom-of-information application fee at $10. As Rob Shaw, a member of the press gallery, reported on Twitter, still there: “Update. I’m told the minister signed cabinet order setting FOI fee on Thursday, November 25, shortly after the bill passed the Legislature, not Friday, as OIC is dated. This was not done in normal cabinet meeting but in what is called a corridor order by a minister using her specific powers.”
It is at this point where this alleged breach of privilege occurs. The minister repeated time and again that she was listening and would continue to listen right up to the end of the debate on the last day of session, then somehow had an order-in-council ready to go with an amount already determined and reportedly signed shortly after the assembly adjourned.
The minister’s statements that she was listening and would continue to listen led this Legislative Assembly and the people we represent to believe that there was time to provide feedback and that perhaps even the minister would be announcing a process to gather more feedback. However, it appears the decision had already been made and the documents printed, ready for signing.
Seeing the operation of government over the last five years, it’s difficult to believe that as the minister was standing and repeating the message on the final day of debate, the plan was not already in place to institute the fee immediately following the adjournment of debate.
On November 30, Rob Shaw published the article “Deliberate Misdirection” in The Orca. He writes:
“You’re not allowed to outright lie in the B.C. Legislature. But you can, it seems, get away with misleading it, lying by omission and flagrantly thumbing your nose at the institution. At least that’s what” the Minister of Citizens’ Services “pulled off in the final few days of the fall session of the Legislature as she shepherded her contentious freedom-of-information changes through the House.”
The minister “spent days insisting that even though her bill created new application fees for public information requests, she couldn’t discuss what those fees might be, because they’d be set later by cabinet regulation, an entirely separate ‘process.’”
Shaw continues:
The minister “repeated variations of this line dozens of times over days of debate. A process. A listening exercise. A solicitation for feedback from any and all concerned.
“Except it was a sham.”
As the minister “threw up a smokescreen over the process on November 25, the government had already settled on the fee behind the scenes.
“There would be no new listening.
“The bill passed the Legislature at 5:15 p.m. Within a few hours, that very night,” the minister “signed the regulation setting the new application fee at $10.
“That ‘process’ raises questions. Are you lying to the Legislature when you say you can’t discuss something because you haven’t made up your mind, but then your staff have already secretly printed off the order on that very issue and are waiting for you to get back to your office to sign it into law before grabbing a late dinner?
“If it’s not a lie, it comes awfully close.”
On November 29, 2021, Vaughn Palmer published an article in the Vancouver Sun, entitled “B.C.’s Minister of Misinformation Strikes Again.” He writes:
“‘The details of the legislation are through the regulation process, which is separate from the legislation. But I am listening and will consider these concerns as part of the process,’” quoting the minister.
That was “of a piece with what” the minister “has been saying for weeks, every time the B.C. Liberals asked about the plan to charge the public a fee to apply for information that rightly belongs to the public in the first place.
“She’s refused to answer on the incredible grounds that the legislation merely creates the power to charge a fee. The fee itself will be set by cabinet regulation after the fact.
“‘The fee is something I cannot discuss here,’” the minister “unabashedly declared at one point. ‘At no point anywhere in this legislation are we going to discuss a number of what the fee will be, because it’s set through regulation.’
“All along she maintained that she was listening and that there would be more listening to come before the fee was decided.”
The minister’s “last pledge to listen was delivered in the House shortly after 4 p.m. Thursday.
“Moments later further discussion of Bill 22 was gavelled to an end, under a time allocation motion passed by the New Democrats earlier in the week to expedite passage of their legislative agenda.
“An hour later the remaining business was wrapped up by similar means, and the bills were given royal assent. Just after 5 p.m., the House adjourned until next February.
“Later that evening” the minister, “joined by cabinet colleague” the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy, “signed a cabinet order approving the fee of $10.
“That was mere hours after insinuating, as she had done for weeks, that the fee was still subject to a listening exercise to be resolved by” the minister and the minister’s cabinet colleagues “at a later date.
“Instead, the decision was already made before the House adjourned.
“There was no cabinet meeting Thursday evening, and” the minister “was on record as recommending a fee in the range of $25.
“No way would such an obedient functionary as the minister have decided to lower it to $10 on her own say-so.
“So that, too, was a piece, with the evasions and obfuscations, that made her the de facto minister of misinformation during the fall session.”
As this House adjourned last fall, the frustration in the opposition, the media and the public was palpable. In addition to the debate on the contentious proposed amendments to Bill 22, the government introduced two large bills with dramatic changes to forestry legislation.
Anyone who has been around these chambers for any amount of time knew that there was little chance that these laws would have the deserved, detailed democratic debate. Indeed, the government used time allocation to limit the debate so they could complete their legislative agenda by their own self-imposed deadline.
The new official opposition House Leader was quoted in Shaw’s article at the time, saying: “At the best, the minister misled the House. At worst, she’s outright intentionally misled the House. What’s particularly galling is that the minister looks into the cameras and says there’s going to be more discussion on a fee question, there’s going to be more engagement, and there will be consultation.”
These are, indeed, strong words spoken in this House. They’re strong words spoken outside this House — strong words written by respected members of our press gallery and published in respected publications in this province for all to read. This, the public record, must be addressed.
Maintaining the public confidence in their institution of government relies on the members of the executive not interfering or obstructing in the work of members in holding government accountable and that all our work protects the dignity and integrity of this House. When the members of the press gallery of this Legislature write such articles about the behaviour of a member of our executive, articles that accurately reflect the feeling that I and other members of the opposition, whose duty it is to hold those members accountable…. The question must be asked of the Speaker whether a breach of privilege has occurred.
As outlined in David McGee’s Parliamentary Practice in New Zealand, third edition, Wellington, Dunmore, 2005:
“In appearing before the committee on the matter, the Clerk of the House referred to Parliamentary Practice in New Zealand, where it is stated that the following elements have to be established when it is alleged that a member is in contempt for deliberately misleading the House: (1) it must be proven that the statement is misleading; (2) it must be established that the member making the statement knew at the time that the statement was incorrect; and (3) that in making the statement, the member intended to mislead the House.”
As has been shown in the evidence produced here, the minister and cabinet were not continuing to listen to the feedback in those final moments of the debate. The decision was not brought before cabinet following the bill receiving royal assent. The decision had already been made. So when the minister stood in those final moments, reassuring the members of this parliament that the government was listening, the minister had to know that that was incorrect and that her ministry had already drafted, or was in the process of drafting, an order-in-council. As such, when the minister made the statement in this chamber, was it to intentionally mislead this House?
Majority governments wield exceptional power in this institution. They must, however, remember that each one of us is elected to represent our constituents, and the privileges earned over generations by our predecessors must be maintained. They’re only maintained by the members in this House exercising those powers and those privileges.
To maintain the confidence of British Columbians, the checks and balances that have been created through our standing orders, procedures and protocols must be upheld. The people of British Columbia must be satisfied that the government they elect through democratic processes is transparent in their dealings on our behalf and that they will be held accountable by the members of this Legislative Assembly should they break that trust.
As we have seen, the public allegations against the Minister of Citizens’ Services must be investigated further, and that is why I’m asking you, Mr. Speaker, to assess whether a prima facie breach of privilege has occurred. If it has, I’m prepared to move a motion that the issue be referred to the Select Standing Committee on Parliamentary Reform, Ethical Conduct, Standing Orders and Private Bills for further investigation.
HÍSW̱ḴE SIÁM.
M. de Jong: Hon. Chair, may I say I’m cognizant of the fact that you have afforded my friend from Saanich North and the Islands an extensive amount of time to make the presentation. I think that was appropriate, given the gravity of the matter before the House. I won’t require a similar amount of time. I’m obliged, and I think most members are obliged, to the Chair for affording members this opportunity.
I thought it was interesting. Yesterday we received a useful reminder from the Attorney General — via the introduction of Bill 1, of all things — that sometimes it’s important for us not to take things for granted.
We just heard the member from Saanich North, from the Green Party, refer back to the year 1400. There are history lessons that are appropriate to take.
Inasmuch as the accusation being made against the Minister of Citizens’ Services is a very serious one, I thought it appropriate to briefly reconsult the authorities that guide the Chair on matters such as this.
I think, for this chamber and for this parliament, the clearest authority that I can find derives from Speaker Harvey Schroeder in his ruling on April 13, 1982. It’s found at pages 351 and 352 of Parliamentary Practice. I must confess I have the fourth edition, with apologies to the Table. It’s the last one I have with my name embossed on it, so I have a certain nostalgic attachment to this edition.
Here, in all seriousness, is what Speaker Schroeder said. The test here is an onerous one — onerous indeed and for good reason. He writes: “Unless there is evidence that a member has deliberately misled the House, a matter of privilege has not been established.”
Later in the same ruling, he writes — again, pertaining to this assembly: “…in this chamber, by its very nature, countless disputes relating to allegations of fact will arise, and with great frequency. To routinely convert those disagreements into what amounts to a charge of deliberately misleading the House would be contrary to well-established traditions observed throughout all parliaments. This tradition states that all hon. Members will accept the word of all hon. Members, a tradition which I commend to this House.”
The entire passage is instructive, in my view, and speaks to that rather onerous test that must be met before sustaining the kind of allegation that is before the House now. But if I could direct the Chair and members’ attention to the final line, which emphasizes the point that this House can only operate on the basis that the information that is conveyed between members is truthful. It’s a fundamental tenet of how this place must operate. I think your predecessor, Speaker Schroeder, included that for a reason.
Here’s what we know about the matter before the House now. On October 18 of last year, the minister introduced Bill 22. On October 26 of last fall, Bill 22 passed second reading after a vigorous debate. My friend from Saanich North and the Islands has presented a comprehensive summary of some of the commentary. I won’t go through all of that, but I’ll refer back to a few of it.
I am going to add to the narrative. Part of the submission that the House has heard from the member for Saanich North and the Islands, which I think is a logical one, is that based on the circumstantial evidence, something must have been up. The decision must have already been made.
In fact, Mr. Speaker, in ruling on this matter and this application, you don’t have to rely on circumstantial evidence, because there are documents. I’m going to table the documents, and you’ll have them at your disposal.
Keeping in mind what we heard from Saanich North and the Islands about the ongoing debate, on October 27, there was an email exchange between the minister and Kassandra Lawal.
On October 27, at 3:56 p.m., the following email went to the minister: “To update fee recommendation, DN attached requiring your approval.” Now, I’m asking the Chair to accept that “DN” means decision note. “To update fee recommendation, decision note attached requiring your approval. Cheers, Kass.”
Reply at 3:59 on October 27 from the minister: “Approved.” Decision note approved pertaining to the fees, with still a month of debate remaining for Bill 22.
October 27, 3:40 p.m. An email from Jeannette Cook, who I understand is or was the director of executive operations at the deputy minister’s office of the Ministry of Citizens’ Services. This is as follows: “Hi there. Attached is the minister’s decision note for minister’s approval. Thank you, J.C.”
Then from the minister’s office, from Kassandra Lawal, the following, October 27 at 4:14 p.m.: “M.L.B. approved. Please apply e-signature.”
Now, in replying to this, the government may want us to believe that M.L.B. refers to Mr. Lyndon Baines Johnson or Major League Baseball, but given the evidence, I’m going to suggest it’s reasonable for the Chair to conclude that, on October 27 at 4:14, the minister approved the decision note — which, in this case, is referred to as a decision note — pertaining to the setting of fees.
On October 29, again from the individual Jeannette Cook in the Ministry of Citizens’ Services office — at 3:21 p.m. on October 29 — to the minister’s office: “Hi, Kass. Attached is the updated fee issue paper for minister’s approval, as requested.” On the same day, at 3:51, from the minister’s office: “M.L.B. approved. Please apply e-signature.”
As we have just heard, while all of this was taking place within the minister’s office, within government, within her ministry, the minister was pretending and conveying to the House that no decisions had been made, after she had signed the decision notes making the decision. She purposely sought to create the impression that no decision had yet been made.
There is a litany of commentary from Hansard. She said on November 3: “Government is considering applying fees.” She had made the decision about what those fees would be.
She talked on the same day about that, as we’ve heard from my friend for Saanich North and the Islands, about this entirely separate process that might one day take place — except it wasn’t just taking place. It had already taken place. She and the government had settled the matter, and the documentation that I will leave with you confirms that.
We have heard that on November 25, following the imposition of closure of debate, Bill 22 passed committee stage and third reading and received royal assent. We have heard that remarkable chronology of how, within a matter of minutes of receiving royal assent, the minister signed a corridor order confirming application of the fee that turned into an OIC. The minister would have us believe that she instantly signed that order in the complete absence of having taken a decision earlier.
That is what she purposely attempted to convey, and did convey, to this assembly. These are never easy matters to resolve. They’re not easy matters for the Chair to resolve, and I recognize that. To impugn the conduct of a fellow member — in this case, a minister — is an incredibly serious matter.
I also believe this. By your decision, I believe you will set the tone for the conduct of debate that takes place in this chamber, going forward. I’m sorry to impose the magnitude of that submission upon you, but I think we have to settle, as perhaps we have to do periodically in the life of this institution…. Are we going to have debate characterized by the honest exchange of truthful and accurate information, or are we to have debate where members use trickery or sharp practice to deliberately leave an impression in this House that was entirely false and inaccurate?
Believe me, I have learned over the years that upholding the traditions of this House, as articulated by Speaker Schroeder, isn’t always easy, and it’s not always politically convenient. But in finding a prima facie to explore further the conduct of the Minister of Citizens’ Services, I believe you have an opportunity to remind all of us of the importance of those standards and traditions. On the strength of the documents and evidence that have been presented to you today, I urge you to find that prima facie case.
Hon. L. Beare: I reserve my right to reply.
Mr. Speaker: Thank you, Members and Minister.
M. de Jong: I should formally table the documents that I referred to in my submission.
Mr. Speaker: That’s fine.
Members, the Chair has heard all the comments made by the member for Saanich North and the Islands and the member for Abbotsford West. I wait to hear the minister’s comments — hopefully soon — and I take it under advisement.
The Chair will get back to the House at the first opportunity.
Orders of the Day
Hon. L. Beare: I call Address in Reply to the Speech from the Throne.
[R. Leonard in the chair.]
Throne Speech Debate
S. Chant: I move, seconded by the member for Chilliwack:
[That we, Her Majesty’s most dutiful and loyal subjects, the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia in session assembled, beg leave to thank Your Honour for the gracious Speech which Your Honour has addressed to us at the opening of the present session.]
I thank you, Madam Speaker, for the opportunity to address the members of this House in response to the throne speech.
Before I begin my remarks, I acknowledge I’m currently working and staying on the unceded lands of the Songhees, Esquimalt and Lək̓ʷəŋin̓əŋ-speaking people and that North Vancouver–Seymour, my riding, where I live, work and learn, is in the territory of the Coast Salish, specifically the Tsleil-Waututh and Squamish Nations. I continue to work towards collaborating with Indigenous partners in a variety of areas, and I value that partnership immensely.
I would also like to acknowledge the vast cultural diversity that gives our province so much strength and to encourage everyone to celebrate their various events safely with and for their families and communities. Of course, I also want to take this opportunity to thank the constituents and businesses of North Vancouver–Seymour for their continued support and for their belief in me as an advocate and representative on their behalf. The opportunity to speak with many people is critically important, enhanced by emails, social media and virtual media options.
My constituency staff continue to amaze me in how effective and efficient they are at ensuring that constituents are recognized, acknowledged and responded to in a timely and respectful fashion, and at wrangling me, so that I’m in the right place, doing the right thing at the right time, which is much harder than it sounds.
Eli Mallin, Michael Charrois and Heather Andrews make up the team that keeps my constituency office open and running. You have no idea how many B.C. vaccine cards they have created, laminated and distributed — and also, the printing of Canadian vaccine papers, to name a couple of the many day-to-day functions.
And my family. My husband, Rick, continues to be the patient mainstay who has the courage and commitment to tell me when I’m overdoing it or overthinking, as well as being able to say no, on occasion, when I volunteer us for too much. My daughters Lindsey and Nicole try to very hard to care for me and provide a buffer when the media, social or otherwise, are forcefully expressing their opinions for things done — or not done, depending on the situation. Both my brothers, Ken and Bill, continue to provide support and ideas on how to make things better for our community and our province. The rest of my family and friends are honest, direct and patient with me, for which I am grateful.
We are in a time where we all need something. Some of those needs are common to everyone. Some of the needs are specific to individuals, groups, communities, businesses and sectors throughout our province. Ideally, we all work in concert to identify and meet those needs as best we can, using an established and detailed map to chart our course.
We build this map in a variety of ways. Initially, a big picture is laid out with all of the overarching information represented: areas of focus, areas of concern and areas that are providing strong prototypes that work and could be applied elsewhere.
As time and work go on, the next overlay becomes evident. Greater detail is added, and initiatives, projects and ongoing ventures are placed, like puzzle pieces. For some, easy to see how they fit together to form a clear picture. For some, much more complex and needing time, money and effort to accomplish.
Every time that we step back and look at the picture, we can see where focus is needed. Resources are determined and allocated. Entities take on or maintain oversight, and the work goes on. This is a cycle that repeats itself over and over. When it is done well, it produces outcomes that can be recognized to meet the identified needs in a way that works for and with those who are impacted. It is ongoing work, and it’s the work of the people and the government of this province.
The throne speech lays out the preliminary map for our work, speaking to those identified needs and providing a platform for ongoing discussion and efforts to create a better present and future with British Columbia. It assures us of support for our endeavours and encourages all of us to bring our best ideas, creativity and willingness to the table.
This year, much like last year, there are many elements to be addressed that are ongoing and new opportunities that have been recognized for further exploration and innovation. I will speak to these ongoing areas initially, as those are where we are the most familiar and that represent a large component of our day-to-day business — areas such as COVID management and recovery, which we all thought would be in the past by this time.
However, that is not the case, and we are still demonstrating high levels of resilience, nimbleness and dogged determination to get through something that has impacted not only British Columbia, not only Canada or North America but the world.
Most of us have no experience of epidemics, let alone a pandemic. As we have seen over the past year, many people have opinions and beliefs around how government should manage each and every aspect associated with trying to keep a population as safe and healthy as possible. The ministries of our government — Health, Mental Health, Labour, Education, Economic Recovery and Innovation and, in fact, all ministries of the government — have been focused on keeping the people of British Columbia as safe and healthy as possible and have been moving together towards this goal in a whole variety of ways.
The Minister of Health and public health officer providing a steady framework to reduce transmission, to reduce the health impacts and to get through the pandemic.
The Minister of Mental Health identifying the needs of various populations — students, health care providers, Indigenous communities, seniors, front-line service workers, as well as parents and families, to name a few — and bringing in supports that are available at the end of a cell phone, a computer, a land line or other device, as well as in-person services.
The Minister of Economic Recovery and Innovation distributing grants to small and medium businesses to help them get through the downturns that came with the COVID waves, supporting those businesses to get into the virtual marketplace.
The Minister of Labour initially ensuring that workers could get time off to be vaccinated and that there was an interim plan for paid sick leave that allowed workers to not have to choose between going to work sick or not getting paid — an initiative that laid out the preliminary steps for the five days’ paid sick leave for all B.C. workers that came into effect on January 1 of this year.
The Minister of Education, in conjunction with the school boards, staff and administration, kept our schools open as much as possible to provide a structured, safe and healthy environment that kids and families can count on, as well as ensuring that there are alternate options available if in-classroom attendance cannot be achieved.
Actually, I think that everyone is getting the picture of teams of people working together to deal with an entity that has evolved and changed over the past two years. I could continue to outline what each ministry and staff have been doing to mitigate, remediate and eradicate COVID. However, there is a limit to the time I get to speak, and I must ensure that I acknowledge the work of the other official parties in bringing forward concerns, identified gaps and questions that ensure that the voices of all British Columbians are heard.
On top of the management and recovery from COVID, there are so many other matters that need attention, whether ongoing or something new. The work of the government does not stop because of the pandemic. It keeps going, to address such things as climate change, where the CleanBC map outlines many steps being taken to reduce emissions, decrease carbon footprints, increase energy conservation and explore a transition to alternate energy options, to name a few of the focal points.
Forestry practices are under review and revision to bring them into the current application so that the many values of our beautiful and bountiful trees are able to be enjoyed and stewarded in ways that benefit all. A royalty review has been initiated, looking at oil and gas subsidies and how producers can contribute to the economic recovery and growth in our province.
New provincial parks have been designated, with protected flora and fauna ecosystems. Other parks have been renamed in recognition of our Indigenous partners, which includes, I might add, Say Nuth Khaw Yum Park. Here is where the Tsleil-Waututh Nation has been doing some amazing work in rehabilitating the inlet waters, so much so that the natural bounty of the sea has begun to be edible again. The eelgrass which supports and sustains many aquatic creatures, has revived, and we recently saw whales coming into the inlet — magic.
Funding has gone out to a myriad of groups that husband the land, water, animals, plants and fish of our province, sometimes to rehabilitate, sometimes to promote and sometimes to maintain a vast spectrum of natural abundance.
B.C. is a leader in the number of electric vehicles being used, a trend that has been evident over the last couple of years. Supportive local initiatives such as banning single-use plastics, recycling fishing gear that has been taken out of the ocean, clearing the coastal beaches of flotsam and jetsam accumulated over the years, establishing a temporary ban on the use of rodenticides, streamlining the process to return bottles and cans — starting this month, to be able to return milk containers for a refund. All of these things contribute towards our efforts to manage the environmental aspects of climate change.
Then we have to look at how to manage the impact this climate change is having on our lives overall, with temperature fluctuations beyond the norms established over the past 150 years. Heat, cold, fires, floods, winds and the subsequent effects of these extremes provide a task of herculean proportions to save lives, save livelihoods, keep supply chains moving or help rebuild, not to mention all the efforts that are put in proactively to be ready for these events when they occur and provide service and support toward keeping people safe and healthy while it is happening, for whatever the duration.
I would be most remiss if I did not speak to the ongoing and extraordinary work of the B.C. health care system, with its multitude of aspects that are all concentrated not only on getting us through COVID but on the ongoing aspects of promotion, protection and maintenance of health of people across their lifespan.
There are registered nurses, nurse practitioners, licensed practical nurses and care aides in hospitals, long-term-care facilities, community clinics and a variety of other settings, trying to ensure the best possible care for clients. That care includes things like personal care, symptom management, wound care and palliation, to name a few foci.
There are physicians in public care settings, in clinics and in their own offices, seeing patients either remotely or in person, also aiming to keep the population as healthy as possible or achieve a manageable quality of life. All the other clinicians — occupational therapists, physiotherapists, respiratory therapists, dietitians, imaging technicians, phlebotomists, lab technicians and more — have specialized education and are there to provide the best possible care.
Our housekeepers and maintenance crews are critical in maintaining clean, safe environments for patients to recuperate and for staff to work safely. Dietary aides ensure that appropriate and nutritious meals are able to be consumed, and the clerical staff make sure that the administration and communication flow as smoothly as possible.
The first responders out in our communities, our fire and police, who re-establish community safety, and our emergency medical technicians, who assess, stabilize and transport sick and injured people to a higher level of care — all of these links are critical and in place, COVID or not. Again, I offer the gratitude of this House towards the dedication, commitment and determination of the folks in this sector, who continue to serve this province through the most difficult of times.
How to speak to the overdose crisis that is terrifying and terrible in the loss of life, grief, guilt and profound impact on those touched by its unpredictable presence? So many things have been done to stem the flow of death, and there’s so much more that can and will be done.
Access to services, treatment, care for all ages, all walks of life, all communities. Increased awareness of the poisoned drug supply, combined with increased access to safe drugs or alternatives. More education in schools, in businesses and workplaces, on construction sites and a variety of other settings. Talking about drug use, reducing and eradicating the stigma. Not using alone. How to recognize overdose and be able to use antidotes such as naloxone.
Efforts to update the Criminal Code so that possession for the purpose of personal use is no longer a criminal offence to be dealt with by the police and judicial system. Bringing the concept of addiction into the world of health and illness, rather than that of crime, shame or stigma. Creating safe spaces for using or rehabilitating, spaces that are accessible and useful to all those who do access them. The trajectory of this type of preventable death will change as we all work together to identify and create the information, tools, services and resources that are needed for people to not only survive but thrive.
Economic recovery and stability are vital to the future of our province and the population. There are no cookie-cutter plans that can be applied to all sectors or even to all components of any given sector. That is why all of our ministries have been creating and implementing a full spectrum of support options for our businesses.
Tourism operators have pivoted to do environmental cleanup of our coasts, supporting the vaccine clinics and a variety of other functions.
Many of my constituents work in the film industry. After a worldwide shutdown of film production, Hollywood North and our burgeoning tech sector are on the rebound because of stringent COVID protocols that served to create and maintain a healthy and safe workplace.
Artists and arts and culture organizations have pivoted really well to online creation and distribution so that even in times of isolation and lockdown, we can still turn to our storytellers for solace and entertainment. My office is currently showcasing works from a group called arTHANKS, which has done artwork to give to health care providers as a gesture of thanks from the art community to the health care community.
A significant number of businesses have applied for and received small and medium business grants, circuit breaker and closure grants to help them maintain staff and continue to provide services. Five days of paid sick leave for those who have never had it in their work contract to reduce the transmission of infectious diseases: COVID, flu, colds, many other things. Increasing the numbers of $10-a-day child care spaces to enable families to make choices about their work-life balance that are not solely driven by child care needs.
These are but a few examples of the last year’s work and products of our government. However, as has been said a number of times, there is still lots to be done.
Helping some of our bigger companies and investors transition into new ways of working and managing the natural resources.
Promoting the work that our Indigenous partners are already doing in supporting the recovery, rehabilitation and renewal of our waterways and lands.
Conversing with communities on what they need to thrive post-COVID.
Supporting non-profit organizations and the amazing work that they do in so many critical areas: housing, supply chain, food safety, socialization, crisis counselling, child care, health care management, building community gardens, organizing events that can be enjoyed safely and so many more things that I could outline, all of which contribute to the strength, resiliency and viability of our communities.
Reducing household costs is an ongoing target of our government. ICBC rebates and reduced costs for insurance, no cost for MSP, increasing the minimum wage, $10-a-day child care and the child opportunity benefit are all examples that provide a template for further efforts toward safe, affordable home life, employment and environment for all of us.
This is just a short list of the things that will continue to occur in order to support recovery and stability for British Columbia, for people, business and industry.
The other thing that we must keep high on our radar is full inclusion of all members of our British Columbia society. Not only is it the right thing that we should be doing at all times, but it is also a huge benefit to our economy in a whole variety of ways.
Over the past year, our job creation has moved steadily upward, currently reaching a point similar to pre-pandemic numbers. It is no secret to anyone that there are staffing shortages in the entire spectrum of work environments — again a by-product, perhaps, of the pandemic. However, critical in our recovery efforts.
The more of our population that is actively employed, the stronger our communities and our province. Everyone should have access to a vocation that pays fairly, has appropriate hours available and is able to offer support as needed to ensure that anyone who has the skills, motivation, interest and willingness has a position that they work in and that works for them.
Inclusion is not something that only speaks in the workplace. It is a framework that must be applied cradle to grave — education, recreation, vocation, health care, culture, language, faith and gender equity, to name a few applications. Inclusion must be integrated into all resources and services, public and private. For some entities, this will require a paradigm shift. For others, it’s something that has been part of the vision and mission statements and is incorporated to an extent. For surprisingly few establishments, it is so much of a norm that in an instance where an accommodation is needed, it’s nothing special or difficult.
An example of one area already implemented is the ability to self-designate a variety of gender options on provincial identification. This is where our province strives to be. To cite my many colleagues, the work continues steadily forward.
B.C.’s senior citizens have been hit hard by the COVID pandemic and continue to be one of our most vulnerable populations. Long-term-care facilities in my riding of North Vancouver–Seymour were ground zero in the first wave, and that’s where the front-line work truly started to try to figure out how to change the trajectory of a deadly virus.
Decisions were made to have health care providers work at single sites to reduce transmission. Wages were addressed, sick time was reviewed, and ultimately, 3,000 more front-line providers were recruited and trained. This was done with an investment of $585 million over three years to launch and support the health career access program.
An additional $1 million went to the Family Caregivers of B.C., where it was directly put toward supporting caregivers of seniors and others. Our government included stakeholders in planning and decision-making and has made significant investments into long-term care.
Another change includes implementing higher care standards to make sure seniors living in long-term-care environments throughout the province receive at least 3.36 hours of care and support per day. That is almost a third increase. Our seniors B.C. website offers information and links for healthy living, transportation, housing and more to help seniors and their caregivers.
Every person in B.C. deserves to live their older years in dignity, safety and with optimal health. Our government has taken steps to make this commitment a reality for seniors in long-term care and in the community. The North Shore has seen the opening of a new long-term-care facility, Creekstone, and is watching as our Lions Gate Hospital builds a new acute care tower, with single-person rooms for enhanced infection control and an increased variety of in-house services.
Child care continues to be a top priority of our government as we expand access to affordable care, enhancing opportunities for families to thrive. Our commitment to $10-a-day daycare is augmented with the building of new facilities and the integration of many existing ones as well as developing government programs. We continue to take strong steps to reduce the wait-lists that parents face to get their kids into care and to reduce the cost of keeping their kids in a safe, healthy and stimulating environment.
Incorporating our child care systems into our Ministry of Education will provide a solid base for the development of further programs and policies that ensure equitable and affordable access. This shift will also help parents feel confident that child care is a core service for families across this province, reliable and one where no one is left behind. Early childhood education and quality care better equips kids for starting school, promoting a smoother transition for families during a critical time in a child’s life.
Child care, in the face of this pandemic, is of vital importance. Our Minister of State for Child Care and our Minister of Children and Family Development have been diligent in ensuring that proper COVID-19 protocols have been followed. Recent announcements of funding for enhanced health and safety in child care facilities were welcome news to both child care providers and families. Additionally, many families are now obtaining the B.C. child opportunity benefit, which can supplement the family income by up to $19,000 annually.
Children in care have also been a significant focus and will continue to be so as the government recognizes that the parenting role is both critical and substantial to children, youth and young adults. The Ministry of Children and Family Development has taken a multifaceted approach toward hearing and implementing recommendations from the child and youth advocate.
The overrepresentation of Indigenous children in care and the difficulties encountered by young people who come out of care, including access to tertiary education, homelessness, limited job training and prospects and mental health issues are all complex issues that are being addressed in a variety of ways.
The actual number of children under the government’s care has diminished. The age at which they are no longer in care has been increased substantially, and tertiary education is free. These are big steps, with more to come.
Our government has made sure that all of B.C. benefits from this work. Large capital projects to create jobs, housing and opportunities for communities across this province continue to be announced. I want to stress that these projects are not just brought into ridings held by our government MLAs. I would like to recognize some recent investments in ridings held by members of the opposition.
In Kamloops, both north and south, our province announced three new shelters for people experiencing homelessness. Guests in these facilities will have access to hot meals, sanitation supplies and referral to health programs. We also announced 37 new affordable housing rental units and over 100 new affordable senior homes.
In Kelowna, 122 new affordable energy-efficient homes, made with mass timber, primarily funded through B.C.’s community housing fund. The jobs created from building this project as well as the housing provided will no doubt be of great benefit to all three ridings in that city.
Through B.C. Housing funding, the village of Clinton was able to welcome 20 new units of housing for low- to moderate-income seniors. And 38 new units of supportive housing was announced for Salmon Arm to support people experiencing or at risk of homelessness. Valemount will see 14 new units of housing for women and children fleeing violence, with a 72-space child care facility built in as well.
In Fort St. John and Fort Nelson, two lovely communities in the Peace River North, CleanBC grants will replace gas-powered drivers and pumps with new clean electric technology that will create good new jobs and allow the existing energy industries there to thrive and succeed in the new green economy.
In Peace River South, $1 million is being provided to the NorthRiver Midstream to install a waste heat recovery system at their highway processing facility to reduce natural gas use and, again, help industries here transition into a cleaner economy.
I review this work to remind our members opposite that our government values insist that we leave no one out in our aim to provide safe, healthy living and working opportunities for all.
Over the past year, I have vaccinated over 1,000 people — first, second or booster inoculations. I speak to each one of these people for perhaps a couple of minutes. We talk about families, kids, work, travel or whatever topic comes to mind as they get a shot.
I’ve also had the opportunity for many of my constituents to meet with me face to face or by Zoom or Teams, out walking, on the phone, through messaging or other mediums. Everyone is tired — no, exhausted — by the continuous effort they are making, day in and day out, to get through the pandemic. They are worried about how their kids are going to get housing and where. What are the children of today going to inherit in terms of climate change? Who is going to care for people as they age? Why is the traffic congestion so bad?
Those people and the people throughout our province take assurance that their government is made up of people who worry about the same things and are working towards making things better in a myriad of ways. My new year’s resolve for both January 1 and the lunar new year was that 2022, the Year of the Tiger, was to be boring to give our province the chance to catch its breath and resume a predictable lifestyle, whatever that means to each of us.
Our government will continue to invest in the things that are important, because we know, to cite the Lieutenant-Governor, we cannot cut our way to the future. I will take this opportunity to thank Her Honour for her strong, insightful and supportive words that lay out the initial map for this session of the Legislature to work with. I look forward to collaborating with my colleagues on both sides of the House to achieve progress on many fronts and to develop new initiatives that address issues important to the people of British Columbia.
With that, I conclude my remarks.
D. Coulter: I rise to second the motion: “That we, Her Majesty’s most dutiful and loyal subjects, the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia in session assembled, beg leave to thank Your Honour for the gracious Speech which Your Honour has addressed to us at the opening of the present session.”
I’d first like to begin by acknowledging that I’m on the traditional territory of the Lək̓ʷəŋin̓əŋ-speaking people, in particular that of the Songhees and Esquimalt First Nations.
I’d also like to take a second, Madam Speaker, to congratulate you on your appointment. It’s very nice to have your steady hand in the chair — and your wonderful mask. It’s wonderful to look at while I’m speaking.
I’d just like to say that this is the best job I’ve ever had. In fact, it will probably be the best job I’ll ever have. It is an incredible honour to serve my community and bring their perspective and concerns here to Victoria. It’s an immense privilege to be in this chamber and able to speak on behalf of my community.
As is customary, I guess I have to do some thank-yous in my speech about the throne speech. I’ll begin by thanking my parents. I know they’re watching today. My mother was furiously texting me and wanted to be able to see me on the legislative channel, which is very nice and sweet and brings a tear to my eye. Well, my parents earned every single grey hair that they have from raising my brother and myself, and I can’t thank them enough for everything they’ve done for me. I know I’ve tortured them in some way, in small ways, so I have to thank them.
I’d also like to thank my wife. Without her patience and support, I wouldn’t be here. I’d also like to give a shout-out to my wife. She just started at Chilliwack Hospital as a medical lab assistant, so she’s working on the front lines and is a front-line worker. She takes blood from patients. She does all sorts of things. I have no idea everything she does. It’s just amazing, all the things she does.
With that, I’d really like to thank all the front-line workers during this difficult time. I mean, what a year it has been since my last throne speech — fires, floods, waves of COVID. It’s been a really tough year for all of us and especially for front-line workers. I’d like to just thank them all for everything that they do.
The throne speech lays out a vision to support people by improving child care, making life more affordable, reducing poverty, advancing reconciliation and investing in the services people rely on. Government plans to continue to support people, whether that’s to rebuild after the fires and floods or getting through this wave of COVID.
I think it’s fair to have empathy for folks who are, I guess, sick and tired of all of these measures and vaccines and the rest of it. I think we shouldn’t talk about them with derision. However, COVID-19 is a disease, and it just doesn’t go away just because you want it to.
I encourage and I thank all the citizens in my constituency for getting vaccinated. You know, people say: “Oh, well, society is divided.” It really isn’t. Ninety percent of British Columbians are vaccinated. It’s probably the most support for any political…. Well, it’s not a political position. It’s the most support for anything that I know of in my recent memory.
I’m so proud of my colleague the Minister of Jobs, Economic Recovery and Innovation. He moved quickly to set up programs that normally take months to get going, and he did it in a matter of weeks. Through his ministry, the government has provided $500 million to businesses through direct grants, and this work continues.
I’ve spoken to a small business owner in downtown Chilliwack, and she has taken advantage of these grants. Many of you might know the business. It’s called The Book Man. It’s a little bit famous in British Columbia. Amber, her husband and her father are amazing and have kept this bookstore going. You know, 2020 was a very hard year for them. Amber says the business had substantial loss, and she thanks both the federal and provincial governments for supporting her and getting her through this hard time.
This is a quote from Amber: “The Book Man is grateful to have been able to access wage subsidies, CERB, an accessibility grant, the small business grant and the grant for improving our online presence. These incredibly helpful contributions helped put us back on our feet. They saw us through a very tough time, and we were able to create more equity and accessibility at our business. I’m proud to say we just had our best year ever.”
I know she is currently working on doubling the footprint of her store in downtown Chilliwack. It’s an amazing success story in Chilliwack, and it would be a real shame to lose that bookstore. It’s a real part of Chilliwack.
The devastating floods in the fall devastated many parts of British Columbia. They washed out roads and flooded farms and homes. In my community, we were forced to evacuate 1,000 homes. Chilliwack was cut off from the rest of B.C. as roads were washed out and flooded. Highway 1 was under water and impassable. Grocery shelves went empty, and gasoline stations ran out of fuel. Farmers had trouble getting feed, and dairy farmers were having to dump their milk.
Many of our residents also have deep connections. The part of my constituency that flooded is called Yarrow, and it really is part of the Sumas Prairie. The residents in that part of my constituency have a deep connection with the Sumas Prairie and people who live on the Sumas Prairie.
We’ve developed a resiliency centre. I don’t know if anyone knows where the Yellow Barn is. Yes? I’ve been working with Chilliwack Community Services, the mayor of Chilliwack. It is outside of Chilliwack. However, we’ve been working and helping set up this resiliency centre. The United Way has been involved, several local churches, the Mennonite Central Committee. It has been an amazing success story. Farmers used to go to the Yellow Deli every morning to have coffee and interact, and they’ve really been missing that in their lives. This is an amazing success story, and I’m very happy about it.
On Monday, the Minister of Agriculture and her federal counterpart announced significant new supports to help farmers get their farms back up and running. The government is also continuing to have conversations with the federal government to let them know what the province needs to build back our communities. This includes cleanup, housing, rebuilding highways and repairing infrastructure.
Outside of building back better, the Speech from the Throne also included some great things on housing. Chilliwack is the second-fastest-growing community in the province. It actually has the highest in-province migration, mostly from Metro Vancouver, because of — I’m going to use quotes here — cheaper house prices. I’m going to tell you about some shocking house prices now. House prices went up 43 percent this year.
You know, it’s amazing. I talked to a constituent of mine, a young woman. She and her husband have saved up a substantial down payment that a year ago probably would have been a 25 percent down payment. Now it’s not big enough. The house she rents and lives in now was sold for $600,000 just before she rented it. Eight months later it was sold for $980,000. The current owner didn’t want to sell it, but people were coming to him. He didn’t even have to list the house, and he sold it for $1.3 million.
That’s an incredible price jump over the course of a year and a half or two years. It’s amazing, actually. It’s shocking, yes. Her family is going to have a very hard time ever getting into the housing market.
A cooling-off period, introduced by the Finance Minister, is desperately needed. Some houses are selling for $500,000 above asking. Having a cooling-off period would be an excellent start to making home ownership affordable again. The pandemic has been a shock to the housing market, and if it were not for actions that the B.C. NDP government took when we took office, the impacts would be far worse.
The opposition had no plans to address out-of-control housing prices in 2017, when they left, and they don’t have any ideas now. The only idea I’ve heard is from their new leader, who said that he would scrap the speculation and vacancy tax, which would take 18,000 rental homes off the market. Doing that is only good for people who have second homes that are vacant. That isn’t good for most of British Columbia. That’s really helping out the well-connected and wealthy friends that you have. I don’t think you’re taking the problem seriously if that’s your idea.
I’d like to talk a little bit about the accessibility legislation that we introduced last spring, and just maybe tell the House where we’re at with it. As everyone knows, in the accessibility legislation it requires government to form a provincial accessibility committee. We have formed that committee and we have great participants. We had our first meeting last month. The candidates are impressive. With your indulgence, I hope I can just tell you who the candidates are and what they do.
We have Debra Maria Abraham. Debra Abraham founded a unique get-together society. She is of Caribbean, Cree and Sioux descent. She has over 20 years of experience working in social services. Active in her community, she’s a board member with Global Access and Inclusion Foundation, and she has also been a secretary for the Coquitlam Foundation.
Sheryl Burns is president of the Canadian Union of Public Employees Local 1936. She has also worked as a legal advocacy program coordinator for the Battered Women’s Support Services. Active in her community, she is an elected persons with disabilities representative on the B.C. Federation of Labour executive council. She’s also a general vice president for CUPE B.C., and the CUPE B.C. representative for the city of Vancouver joint child care working group.
Vinu Abraham Chetipurackal is deaf, and works as a commercial banking analyst for an international bank headquartered in B.C. Active in his community, he is a co-founder and co-chair of the deaf inclusion and diversity leadership council B.C. under the Greater Vancouver Association of the Deaf.
Spring Hawes is my co-chair. I co-chair this committee, so I’m very excited to tell you that Spring Hawes is the co-chair. Spring Hawes incurred a spinal cord injury 15 years ago and is a tetraplegic. She is an entrepreneur and has served as a councillor for the district of Invermere. She’s on the boards for the Interior Health Authority and Accessible Okanagan, and she’s also a volunteer peer for Spinal Cord Injury B.C.
Ken Kramer, QC, TEP, is the founder and principal of KMK Law, and the law firm specializes in the areas of estates, trust, administration, elder law, estate litigation and mediation. He was actually a candidate, and ran to be an MLA at one time. He’s an excellent addition to the committee.
We have Michael McLellan. Michael McLellan lives with a visual impairment and developmental disability. He’s president of Empowering Self Advocates to Take Action, where he teaches a course on people planning together. He chairs the Self Advocate Leadership Network committee, and co-chairs the self-advocate committee for Inclusion B.C. He’s been a president of B.C. People First and a member of the Comox Valley Accessibility Committee. He works with Community Living B.C. and other community services.
Maybe I should stop here, too, because it’s obvious that “Nothing about us without us” is really our guiding principle here. That’s why the minister, who is sitting in the chamber, appointed and chose these people. He did a great job.
Kirsten Sutton is the chief technology and information officer at Vancouver City Savings Credit Union. She is the chair of the Greater Vancouver Board of Trade, a director for Science World and B.C. Tech, and a member of the federal government’s Task Force on Women in the Economy. She is also a member and past co-chair of the Presidents Group, which champions accessible and inclusive workplaces. She’s a great addition to the committee.
Rheanna Robinson is an Indigenous scholar of Métis ancestry and an assistant professor in the department of First Nations studies at the University of Northern British Columbia. She is a director and an ambassador for the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada. She has also served on the executive committee for ALS/SLA Action Canada and as vice-chair for Carney Hill Neighbourhood Centre and as a director for the Prince George Métis Community Association.
Rob Sleath is a seminar facilitator with blind and sight-impaired consumers. He’s also the founding president for Access for Sight-Impaired Consumers and a director for the Canadian National Institute for the Blind advisory board. He’s also been a director for the CNIB national board, president of the committee for the promotion of accessible conventional transit and founding chair of Access Transit Users Advisory Committee for the south coast of British Columbia.
Mary Teegee is Gitxsan-Carrier from the Takla Nation. She belongs to the Lax Gibuu, wolf, clan, from the House of Nyguup. She is the executive director of child and family services at Carrier-Sekani Family Services. She has also been deputy chief and treaty negotiator for Takla First Nation, and she is president of the B.C. Aboriginal Child Care Society and chair of the Indigenous Child and Family Services Directors. She is also a B.C. board representative for the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada.
Jessica Vliegenthart is a trial lawyer for Fulton and Co. LLP and a Canadian Paralympian in wheelchair basketball. She’s a board member of Spinal Cord Injury British Columbia and is an ambassador for the Rick Hansen Foundation. She is also co-founder and a director for Kamloops Adapted Sports Association, and she has been an athlete representative on the revenue generation and government relations section of the Canadian Paralympic Committee.
That’s just an amazing list of folks who are on our provincial accessibility committee. I’m very excited to get down to work with them and start creating regulations that make B.C. a more accessible place.
I should point out that while we’re still working on the accessibility legislation, the government hasn’t stopped nor will it stop from making spaces more accessible. There are great things that the government is doing. The Ministry of Environment has some great initiatives: some wheelchair-accessible washrooms, also cabins that wheelchair users or other people who use mobility devices can use — very close to my constituency, actually, up at Cultus Lake. That’s in the constituency of my friend from Chilliwack-Kent. Government is doing a lot of good work here, so I’m quite excited about it.
I do want to mention that we’re helping to prepare people for the jobs of future with a generational commitment to develop the talent B.C. needs over the next ten years, because there is a skills gap. My friend from Langley, Parliamentary Secretary for Skills Training, is doing excellent work on this file. I was so happy to hear about it in the throne speech.
Something else that is helping to train skilled workers is community benefit agreements. Community benefits agreements are an amazing thing when government builds large infrastructure projects and then can invest in its community at the same time. It’s incredible.
We know nearly 20 percent of construction workers are age 55 or over and just 12 percent are under the age of 25. Women represent only 14 percent of the total workforce and 6 percent of on-site employment, while Indigenous peoples represent just 8 percent of total employment. Coupled with this, apprenticeship completion rates in B.C. are among the lowest in Canada. Only 40 to 45 percent of apprentices finish their programs. Without action, B.C’s construction sector is headed towards a crippling industry skills shortage.
To address these challenges, the B.C. government introduced the community benefits agreement program in 2018 — and also the wonderful work that my friend from Langley has been doing as well.
The CBA objectives include increasing the employment opportunities for women, Indigenous peoples, young people and local area residents; increasing apprenticeship opportunities with a target of 25 percent participation rate on CBA projects; providing a more achievable path to red seal trade certification for apprentices; achieving a more stable and equitable labour relations environment; improving the workplace environment; making the industry more attractive to new entrants; developing a diverse and skilled construction workforce to meet B.C.’s long-term future needs.
I think I’m going to wrap it up here, to the delight of many, I’m sure. I just have to say that I’m very excited for this upcoming session and the good work that we’re going to do — and help to rebuild our economy and our infrastructure and help keep people safe the whole while we’re doing it.
Deputy Speaker: Next, the member for Fraser-Nicola.
J. Tegart: My special thanks to the hon. Speaker. I’m actually supposed to be on my first shift up there, but I’ve missed the first shift. Not a good start. Thank you very much for filling in.
It’s an honour to rise in the House today to provide the first opposition response to this government’s Speech from the Throne. We all know the throne speech to be the guiding document that lays out the government’s vision for our province, moving forward. Though it may not generate as much attention as the provincial budget or some of the significant pieces of legislation a government may bring forward, it is a very important document. You might call it a blueprint for the future.
We know that many people behind the scenes would have put a tremendous amount of time and energy into this document, determining which goals are the most important, which priorities need the most attention and which people need the most help.
Now, imagine if this government put the same amount of effort and attention towards the community of Lytton in my home riding of Fraser-Nicola. Seven months after fire ripped through the village, decimating all of its homes, infrastructure and businesses, after it claimed two lives and destroyed the livelihoods of nearly everyone else, the people of Lytton feel no further ahead than they did the day after the fire. Their hopes to rebuild and move on with life have withered away. Their patience with this government has completely run out.
It’s inexcusable that seven months after this devastating tragedy, nothing has been rebuilt. People are still waiting for debris to be cleared. If they go onto the village of Lytton’s website to look into how to obtain a building permit, they’re completely daunted by the excessive number of steps involved. So they throw their arms in the air. Who can blame them? They are stressed to the max.
I looked in this document. I looked for support for the people in my riding. I remember flying over Lytton with the Premier, the Deputy Premier, and the Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations one week after the fire. I remember very clearly my words to them that day. “You need to send in a team.”
What this government needed to do was send in a team of people with the expertise needed to guide village council and fill in the gaps that were present in the municipality, a team that could help them develop a plan of action at a very sensitive time, following an extremely traumatic experience for everyone who lived in Lytton.
[S. Chandra Herbert in the chair.]
It didn’t happen. The people of Lytton waited and waited. They were scattered throughout the province, waiting for action from a government that promised to have their back. Finally, three months after the fire, we actually saw a short-term recovery plan developed in October.
People waited three months for that assistance from this government — a short-term plan in October. By October, I would suggest to government that short term was well past time. By October, we should have seen a medium to long-term plan, with goals for the community. But again, we didn’t. We should have seen planning that included consultation with the people of the village, planning that reflected what the local residents want their community to look like in the rebuild.
The longer the delays drag on, the more despair my people feel. Where is the leadership? I don’t see it in this throne speech. Where is the expertise? Where is the funding support from government? I was very disappointed, and I can tell you that the people in my riding are extremely disappointed.
They don’t want to be lauded for their resilience. They feel forgotten. They want their homes and their lives back. They want the community they love back. They don’t want words. They want actions. And they want it to be in throne speeches, in budgets, in ministry commitments from a government that seems to not care.
Just as they don’t see many signs of life in their village, they’re seeing so very little from a government that they thought had their back. This lack of action is not just a disservice to these residents who have lost everything. It’s escalating costs. It’s threatening insurance coverage.
The Insurance Bureau of Canada has warned that insurance policies have limits, so people could be exhausting their insurance coverage due to lack of action. The bureau also recently reported that while the insured costs of recovery and reconstruction in Lytton were originally estimated to be $78 million, they have now increased that cost to $102 million, due in large part to the reconstruction delays.
In addition to a growing emotional toll for residents and people who live in the area, and for those on the ground that are absolutely doing their very best to bring services back to the community, we see the financial toll growing, as well, because of this government’s failure to execute.
This was an unimaginable situation for these residents. I’ve sat with them as they recounted the fear they felt that the wildfire put before them. They went in their houses and grabbed whatever they could. Many went in the house and came out to find their vehicle on fire. Many stopped and picked up friends.
Despite all they have been through, all of the trauma they’ve experienced, they simply haven’t been made a priority, not in this throne speech. Some people say: “What’s another month in a hotel or on a relative’s couch? What’s one more season of uncertainty?” No big deal, I guess.
Lytton needs a plan. They need a long-term plan for recovery. They need a funding commitment. They need a government that shows its support through action. They deserve nothing less. Sadly, Lytton isn’t the only community in my riding that is suffering, that has questions for this government and is looking for direction in this blueprint of a throne speech.
We saw First Nations communities, ranchers and others cut off along Highway 8 thanks to November’s slides and flooding. They expressed frustration with the government’s slow response after they were forced to go it alone to get their community members to safety. Weeks went by without so much as a phone call from the province. How is that acceptable in an emergency and in a disaster where people’s lives are at risk? Quite frankly, it’s not good enough.
At the time of each and every one of these disasters, the Premier, the Deputy Premier, the government have all said the right things. But I can tell you that people are still waiting for the action that follows those words.
Endless questions about the fire season. My riding was on fire this summer — numerous fires, numerous announcements from government. Everybody was at the ready. “Don’t worry. We’ve got your back.” Well, I can tell you that the people of Fraser-Nicola have a lot of questions. We have endless questions about the difference between managing fires versus fighting fires.
People of Highway 8 want to know how a fire that started 70 kilometres away burned their properties out, when a government stood up in public and said: “We’ve got every piece of equipment. Every request has been answered. Don’t you worry. We’re there for you.” Well, as they evacuated cattle, as they evacuated their homes, as they watched them burn to the ground…. Let me tell you that people aren’t feeling that government has their back. And as I look in this throne speech, I see very little to give them comfort.
Then we go to Merritt. The people in Merritt continue their massive cleanup and efforts to rebuild following November’s devastating flooding. Not only were they flooded out; now they’re frozen out. The winter weather certainly hasn’t made that job any easier. The stories of people who couldn’t get back in their house in time before it froze, the number of homes that will never be lived in again — as we try to get commitment and funding commitments from all levels of government.
Critical infrastructure in the city of Merritt is needing to be rebuilt, but it’s a long, slow process. In Hope, the district is looking to government for $11 million to stop the Coquihalla River from potentially damaging homes and rendering the town an island should a future, more serious flood occur.
I talk to the leaders in my communities. They indicate that help has been slow to arrive, and people are incredibly frustrated. The floods in November exposed a number of vulnerabilities that need to be addressed quickly. Both the community of Hope and the city of Merritt are worried about these risks. There is a feeling that the worst is yet to come, and more needs to be done to prepare for more serious flooding in the spring freshet.
Both Hope and Merritt have put plans together. After seeing an incredible amount of snow this season, they are extremely concerned about the spring. They want to see action on diking and other preventative measures to keep their communities and their people safe. I have also personally made the case to the Public Safety Minister and Solicitor General that we have a window of opportunity here to do the work that is needed to ease those fears.
We often talk in this House about climate change. I can tell you: the people of Fraser-Nicola feel like we’ve lived that climate change. We often talk about the commitment to risk mitigation. I can tell you: the people of Fraser-Nicola are asking for support in that mitigation, because in two short months, we’re going to be in flooding season again. We know that we’re not ready. My two communities of Hope and Merritt have been at this government’s door for months, asking for the kind of support that is often said in words but is not shown in action.
I’ll also note that on top of these concerns about people’s safety and protection, we know that if we continue to let rivers spread out, become shallow and leave their traditional waterways, we are putting at risk our salmon and steelhead spawning grounds. We have an opportunity to take a look at the Nicola and the Coldwater watershed and do some significant work while the water is low, but it would take action. It would take vision. It would take partnerships. It would take someone standing up and saying: “I’m going to take that on.”
I’ve waited for someone from government to do that, but I haven’t heard the words yet. Officials in my communities have not been encouraged by the response they’ve received from government, which appears to show an air of indifference to the serious risks they face. That’s incredibly disappointing. Nor are farmers and ranchers throughout the province very encouraged after finding it tremendously difficult to access recovery supports.
People in my riding actually evacuated their cattle because of the fires. They barely got them back, only to face isolation because of the floods. Cattle don’t like travel. That’s not their dream — to get in a truck and go to Vanderhoof for the summer. It has an incredible impact on the economy for those ranchers. They’re doing their best, and we’re cautiously optimistic that the recently announced AgriRecovery package from the federal government and the province will offer them the help they need.
Again, think about it. I sat at their kitchen tables at the end of November, listening to them talk about the fact that they’d stayed behind because they wouldn’t let their animals starve or be drowned. What did they get? No support whatsoever, three months before the applications open. They’ve had to feed their cattle. They’ve had to feed their farm animals. On what? No support. We need speed. We need different ways to do things, and I can tell you that they want that. They want to see that in a blueprint for the future, and they see nothing in this throne speech for them.
There are very many vulnerable people in my riding right now, but they are far from the only ones. We continue to see the tragic loss of too many lives to opioids — our second public health crisis, in addition to COVID-19.
And 2021 was B.C.’s deadliest year of the opioid crisis. I don’t understand why we continue to do the same thing and expect different results. For goodness’ sake, we should be working together. We should be putting the politics aside, and we should be focusing on our common interest, which is vulnerable people who deserve our dedication.
We have been calling, along with the Green Party, for the activation of the Select Standing Committee on Health. This is not just a problem of big cities. I see it in my small communities. We see the devastation when we as a government, when we in this House, do not address mental health. It is shameful what we’re doing.
I also want to talk a little bit about affordability, because the recent devastation in my riding has highlighted so many vulnerabilities. People in Merritt…. We’re going to have hundreds of houses that can’t go back due to floods and floodplains. We have no rentals. We have no housing stock. We have people knocking on our door and coming into our office, sobbing, not knowing where they’re going to go. As we phone and work so hard on those files, it is heartbreaking to tell them that we can’t do anything for them.
We have a job to do in this House. Government has a job to do. Their job is to give hope. It’s to give hope to people of this province. I can tell you that for my people, in my area, who are looking for homes — the people of Lytton, the people of Merritt, the people down Highway 8…. I have people whose homes and properties have disappeared, and they’re still paying a mortgage on it. What do you say to people who have had that kind of loss? There is no housing available for them.
People in my riding just want to go home. It’s our job to make sure they have a home to go to. I can tell you: affordability is a huge issue in my area. As COVID has pointed out over the last two years, many people in metro centres have realized that they can do their work anywhere. They’ve realized the value of living in a much more rural area.
In my community, they knock on your door. “Would you like to sell your house?” So we’re seeing a housing crunch across this province that’s not just urban centred. I don’t see a plan that’s going to help my people — not anytime in the near future.
I don’t want to just talk about disasters, but that is the centre of what’s happening in my riding. But we also are looking for opportunities. You know what? We have a lot to learn from what’s happened. There have been incredible heroes on the ground — neighbours helping neighbours, communities helping others.
We think about Hope, which was isolated and had so many people in their community, and how that community stepped up. We think about the partnerships of people flying food in and how incredible those partnerships are. In my riding, we’ve got them helicoptering out vehicles, because vehicles are isolated. We have a lot of work to do, but we have a lot to celebrate, as we look at some of the experiences that happened during the disasters.
I can tell you that when I talk to people in my riding, government is not one of their heroes. That is a shame. Such an opportunity for leadership. Such an opportunity to show empathy and caring. Such an opportunity missed.
As we look at the outcome of the disasters, I remind people all four highways into the Interior come through my riding. I’d like to acknowledge the incredible work done by the Ministry of Transportation, done by Trans Mountain, done by the B.C. Road Builders. It’s not just those people out there all winter, seven days a week, trying to open up transportation routes, but it’s the people in the offices who did the procurement, the engineers, the incredible strength of the people who are committed to building roads in British Columbia.
I was one for whom it took three days to get home from this place. The vulnerability you feel when something that you take for granted is no longer there is unbelievable — the feeling as you drive some of those mountain passes and you see an avalanche sign, and the sadness that we lost so many. I am amazed at the work that has been done by our crews and by their commitment.
I came down the Fraser Canyon, down Highway 1, which has a number of spots that are very vulnerable still, but I can tell you that I felt safe. It’s a little bit slower, but it opens up most of the communities along Highway 1. People in my riding are incredibly thankful to the crews who were on, 24-7, to make that happen.
I see I have about four minutes left. I want to talk about some of my other communities. I can tell you, as an MLA, that there are tons of exciting things happening. I would urge this government, as I look at the throne speech, not to forget that there is a large population that lives above Hope. Many times those of us who live above Hope feel forgotten. We have a lot of work to do, and we have a lot of requests from government. We have a great many voices in this House in order to advocate on that.
I want to close by giving thanks to many heroes on the ground in communities and beyond. Who has been to Boston Bar? What a neat place. Boston Bar stepped up and did a resiliency centre for Lytton, running that seven days a week. They were there for their neighbours. They provided food. They provided a resiliency centre. They gave non-stop. I do believe they gave until COVID broke out. They later got cut off by floods. They were challenged around medical and around food supply, but that community continued to give.
Lillooet stepped up and opened its doors to evacuees, giving them someplace to go, someplace close to home, somewhere to be, during the catastrophe, with the ones they loved. First Nations across the riding provided tremendous support, knowledge and know-how during every natural disaster that we faced this summer. The people of Hope provided food, shelter and warmth to those trapped on the highways after the November floods.
I think about the transportation workers, whom I mentioned earlier. It is thanks to them that we have food on our grocery shelves, and it is thanks to them that we realized how vulnerable we are if we don’t maintain such important routes into the Interior.
It has been 224 days since the community of Lytton and its people were changed forever. It’s long past due for government to step up with its support and get them back on their feet. I drive through Lytton; it has a ten-foot fence with a black barrier.
S. Furstenau: I just want to say thank you to the member for Fraser-Nicola for her very powerful words and also her compassion and care for her communities, which is so evident in how she brings that into the work in this House.
“Brighter years are ahead.” I heard that yesterday in the Speech from the Throne. I thought about how in January my trusted friend and colleague had sent me an article about the Stockdale paradox, as a way for me to think about leadership in a time of overlapping crises.
Adm. James Stockdale was a prisoner of war in Vietnam for 7½ years. While many others in the same situation did not survive, he was able to endure the terrible conditions and the uncertainty. He wasn’t an optimist; he was a realist. His advice: “You must never confuse faith that you will prevail in the end, which you can never afford to lose, with the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they might be.”
Stockdale was interviewed by Jim Collins, who wrote the book Good to Great, which introduced the Stockdale paradox. Stockdale focused on the end of the story of being a prisoner of war:
“I never lost faith in the end of the story. I never doubted, not only that I would get out, but also that I would prevail in the end and turn the experience into the defining event of my life, which, in retrospect, I would not trade.”
His faith should not be confused with optimism. Stockdale explained:
“I lived on a day-to-day basis…. Most guys thought it was really better for everybody to be an optimist. I wasn’t naturally that way; I knew too much about the politics of Asia when I got shot down. I think there was a lot of damage done by optimists; other writers from other wars share that opinion. The problem is some people believe what professional optimists are passing out and come unglued when their predictions don’t work out.
“The optimists. Oh, they were the ones who said: ‘We’re going to be out by Christmas.’ And Christmas would come, and Christmas would go. Then they’d say: ‘We’re going to be out by Easter.’ And Easter would come, and Easter would go. And then Thanksgiving, and then it would be Christmas again. And they died of a broken heart…. This is a very important lesson.
“You must never confuse faith that you will prevail in the end, which you can never afford to lose, with the discipline to confront the most brutal facts of your current reality, whatever they might be.”
The article about the Stockdale paradox, in a Harvard Business School publication, was published in August 2020. It turns out that the authors, Boris Groysberg and Robin Abrahams, were quite prescient about COVID. At the very least, they were not succumbing to the predictions that the optimists were passing out. They wrote:
“Your state, industry, organization or unconscious mind may be pinning hopes on some other event or date after which some version of rescue will come: a vaccine, a cure, a reliable and cheap test, the acquisition of herd immunity. But to review the brutal facts, none of these developments are likely in the foreseeable short term. The possibility remains that there may never be a fully effective vaccine or cure. This virus may be something that we live with and manage for years to come. Doing so will mean changing elements of our social interaction in unprecedented ways that may well lead to irrevocable social changes.”
I think about the stories that we have been told for the last two years. Of course we wanted to be optimistic. Of course we wanted to think that this would be over by June of 2020. Or it would be over when the vaccines come. Or it would be over in July of 2021. Or it would be over by Christmas of 2021. Or it will be over by Family Day 2022. It will not be over.
We are being told it’s time to live with COVID. But what does that mean? Right now, we have the highest number of hospitalizations. We have a still climbing rate of death in this province. We don’t know how many people have COVID anymore, because we’ve essentially stopped even trying to trace. We’ve stopped making testing available. We’re operating pretty much in the dark.
What has astonished me for the last two years is how little we’ve been engaged on the issue of long COVID. There are people who got sick in January or February or March of 2020, and their lives have not returned. They suffer from extraordinary numbers of health issues and problems.
Studies in places where they are trying to map out how much long COVID is consider it to be 10 to 20 percent of people who get COVID who will have long-lasting symptoms, including children — brain fog, fatigue, heart problems, vascular problems. How are we expected to live with COVID without the proper knowledge and tools to do that?
I don’t want to be sick with COVID. I don’t want to die with COVID. I want to have the tools to be able to manage this. That would include clear information about the transmission, access to N95 masks — Hon. Speaker, I see that you’re wearing one yourself — and access to testing so that we can make informed decisions about our own health, our family’s health and our community’s health.
And a government that is committed to not throwing its hands up in the air and saying, “We give up,” but recognizing that this is and will remain a public health crisis for some time. We don’t know how long. But the least we can do is to put the effort into ensuring that people have the tools they need to live through this health crisis.
Just over a hundred years ago — I’m a historian, so this is fascinating to me — the flu pandemic rapidly spread around the world. It is estimated that about 500 million people, or one-third of the world’s population, became infected with the virus. The number of deaths was estimated to be at least 50 million worldwide.
One of those infected was my grandmother, Dorothy Richardson. At the time, she was Dorothy Payne. She was a teenager when she became so ill that she had to have an extended stay in the hospital. In her diary, she writes about coming home to Saturna Island too weak to walk up from the beach to her home and needing to be pushed in a cart by her siblings.
Jay Alexander Navarro, a historian of medicine, describes the patterns at the time. I quote from his University of Michigan health publication “People Gave Up on Flu Pandemic Measures a Century Ago When They Tired of Them — and Paid a Price.” The public responded with widespread compliance at first, mixed with more than a hint of grumbling, push-back and even outright defiance.
“ As the days turned into weeks turned into months, the strictures became harder to tolerate. Theatre and dance hall owners complained about their financial losses. Clergy bemoaned church closures, while offices, factories and, in some cases, even saloons were allowed to remain open. Officials argued whether children were safer in classrooms or at home. Many citizens refused to don face masks while in public, some complaining that they were uncomfortable and others arguing that the government had no right to infringe on their civil liberties.”
There were rounds of closure orders that corresponded with the rise and fall of cases, but eventually, the social distancing orders, which worked to reduce cases and deaths, became harder to maintain.
“By the late autumn of 1918, just weeks after the social distancing orders went into effect, the pandemic seemed to be coming to an end as the number of new infections declined. People clamoured to return to their normal lives. Businesses pressed officials to be allowed to reopen.
“Believing the pandemic was over, state and local authorities began rescinding public health edicts. The nation turned its efforts to addressing the devastation influenza had wrought. For the friends, families and co-workers of the hundreds of thousands of Americans who had died, post-pandemic life was filled with sadness and grief. Many of those still recovering from their bouts with the malady required support and care as they recuperated.
“Taking their cues from officials who had somewhat prematurely declared an end to the pandemic, Americans overwhelmingly hurried to return to their pre-pandemic routines, packed into movie theatres and dance halls, crowded in stores and shops and gathered with friends and families. Officials had warned the nation that cases and deaths would likely continue for some months to come. The burden of public health, however, now rested not on policy but rather on individual responsibility.
“Predictably, the pandemic wore on, stretching into a third deadly wave that lasted through the spring of 1919, with a fourth deadly wave hitting in the winter of 1920.”
I recently proposed and made a call for there being an independent science table in British Columbia. I think, in a time of crisis, as I’ve said, sharing the weight and burden of leadership can only be a good thing.
In addition to scientists and medical experts on that table, I think we need a historian, a psychologist and a sociologist. The pandemic affects every aspect of our lives. From the government’s perspective, it should be seen as important to understand comprehensively both the impact and the proper approach, understanding we’ve been through this before.
It’s trite to say that history repeats itself, but we can see that we could have learned a lot of lessons from the pandemic 100 years ago.
I have spoken a lot inside and outside of this House about my concern that our current approach to politics, to governance and governing, and to our public institutions is making it very difficult, if not impossible, for us to meet the staggering challenges and overlapping crises that we face today. If we consider the Stockdale paradox, that optimism in a time of crisis actually undermines our ability to approach the crisis in an appropriate way, then we can begin to understand the failures that have gotten us here today.
Politicians are, let’s be honest, peddlers of optimism. It’s our currency. Vote for me, and I promise things will be better for you. That’s the foundational premise of politics. What’s concerning, however, is when politics, and especially the politics of optimism, interfere too much with the practice of governing. In an election campaign, politicians can and largely should focus on solutions, ideas, a vision for the future that holds promise for the people that they are asking to represent.
In government, our elected representatives have a duty and a responsibility to be brutally honest, tell the truth about where we are, tell the truth about the challenges we face and be open and accountable about the efforts it will take to solve them and how success is measured. We cannot wish our way to better outcomes. More importantly, we cannot spin a narrative to make reality into something it is not. Until we confront the most brutal facts of our current reality, we cannot know how we will bring about these brighter years ahead.
Two thousand two hundred twenty-four British Columbians were killed by a toxic drug supply in 2021; 2,707, as of yesterday, have died of COVID in the last two years in British Columbia. Nearly 700 people died from a climate change-driven heat dome. As we heard from the member for Fraser-Nicola, towns and communities have been lost. People have been dislocated from their homes, uncertain what their future holds or whether they will ever go back to where or how they lived before.
Life expectancy, which has been tracked in Canada since 1921, which has been tracked since the end of the last pandemic, has been on an upward trend for the last 100 years. But here in B.C., life expectancy for men has been decreasing, widely recognized to be because of the rise of deaths from the toxic drug supply.
Inequality makes this worse. In Vancouver, living in the Downtown Eastside or in Haney in Maple Ridge means that life expectancy in your neighbourhood is ten years lower than for Vancouver residents who live in West Vancouver, West Point Grey, northwest Richmond and parts of South Surrey and Coquitlam.
I think we can agree, as representatives of 87 different electoral districts in this House, that what we would want for the citizens of British Columbia is equal access to the services, to the care, to the institutions that will ensure that where you live in this province does not have that kind of impact on your life expectancy. A government that responds by saying, “We’ve invested $500 million into mental health and addictions,” is a government that is measuring inputs, not outcomes.
I want a government that measures its success in ways that matter in people’s lives, that start with the social determinants of health. Let’s have our throne speeches every year tell us how we are collectively doing by measuring and reporting on these factors that have such a profound effect on us individually and collectively.
In January 2021, the B.C. government appears to have started work on establishing a standard for the social determinants of health, but this work also appears to have been stalled. Instead we hear in the throne speech: “The strongest economy in Canada.” We hear: “The best place to live and raise a family.” That is not the experience for people who are looking for housing in Cowichan or, indeed, almost anywhere in B.C.
Raising a family means having a home that you can afford. It means being able to live in the same community where you work. For too many people, that is becoming an impossibility. People who have worked their whole lives, who have never faced housing insecurity, are wondering where they will live if they are evicted or can’t afford their mortgage payments.
Small business owners who are facing bankruptcy and the loss of their life’s work and investments will not tell us that B.C. has the strongest economy. That economy is not serving the people. We are not measuring the right things. A speech from the throne delivered when our federal capital city is being occupied by people who are calling for the removal of a democratically elected government needs to include brutal honesty about the level of trust in our political systems, our government and our institutions.
The Edelman trust barometer just published its 22nd annual report, and they state: “We find a world ensnared in a vicious cycle of distrust, fuelled by a growing lack of faith in media and government. Through disinformation and division, these two institutions are feeding the cycle and exploiting it for commercial and political gain.” What they describe should be a deeply sobering wake-up call to every one of us.
The summary of their January ’22 report states: “The world is failing to meet the unprecedented challenges of our time because it is ensnared in a vicious cycle of distrust. Four interlocking forces drive this cycle, thwarting progress on climate change, the global pandemic management, racism and mounting tensions between China and the U.S. Left unchecked, the following four forces evident in the 2022 Edelman trust barometer will undermine institutions and further destabilize society.” Government-media distrust spiral, excessive reliance on business, mass class divide and failure of leadership.
How can this government…? What role can we play in this Legislature to restore trust and demonstrate the value and the need for democracy and healthy democratic institutions? We can put aside the hyper-partisanship between elections and instead focus on transparent, collaborative, accountable decision-making. Shine a light onto how decisions are made. Shine a light onto what is informing those decisions, what the intended outcomes are and be accountable by measuring those outcomes.
Parliamentary committees are one avenue to strengthen this. Answering questions from opposition members in a direct, clear, straightforward manner during debate on bills and during estimates debate is another, acknowledging when efforts are not working to achieve the outcomes that we are striving for and being open about when and why it is time to change course.
Ensure that actions match words. Do not say on the one hand that this is a government committed to tackling climate change while on the other hand continuing to give billions of dollars in subsidies of public money to the oil and gas industry.
Do not say that there is nothing more important than protecting the place we call home when we continue to allow clearcut logging of some of the last old growth in the province, when over 1,900 species in B.C. are at risk of extinction but this government has failed to bring in its promised species-at-risk legislation, when this government is going to go forward with flooding some of B.C.’s most valuable agricultural land and most biodiverse regions by plowing ahead with a dam they knew was a mistake from the beginning.
Do not tell British Columbians they have better care, faster and closer to where they live, when over 800,000 people, including tens of thousands in the capital regional district who just found out that they are losing their primary physicians…. Do not tell them that they have better care, faster and closer to where they live, when they do not have access to a physician.
Saying that there are brighter days ahead is not enough. We need to know what those days will feel like. We need to know how that will be measured.
I’ve talked a lot about four objectives we should have for this province. One, people’s basic needs are met. We are a society that has enough wealth and resources to ensure that people have a place to live and food security. Two, the natural systems that we depend on for our health and our well-being — water, air, soil — are protected. Three, our communities are connected, safe, thriving. We have a sense of belonging. We protect culture. And four, our government, our political systems and our institutions are trustworthy.
That’s the vision I have for British Columbia. Once we state a vision like that, then we can start to measure. Are these policies getting us there? Are more people’s needs being met? Are we protecting the natural systems we depend on? Have we proven to be more trustworthy? Do people believe in this mission, this fragile mission of democracy, more than they used to?
We need to talk about that end, that place we’re trying to go together, but as James Stockdale pointed out, we have to be truly honest about the brutal reality of today and how much hard work and determination it will take to get us to those brighter days.
I think we can meet this challenge. I think we can demonstrate to British Columbians that we can earn their trust, that we care about this institution, that we care about democracy, that we care about the needs of the people. We care about future generations, but we’re not going to do that by continuing to do things the same way that we always have. We have to be able to imagine that we can govern in a way that inspires the hope and the trust of the people, no matter what party they support, what part of this province they live in.
We all asked to be here. We all worked pretty hard to get here. I think we all take this very seriously. But I think we have to be brutally honest about where we are today, and we have to be utterly committed to getting to a better place.
Deputy Speaker: Recognizing the member for Abbotsford South.
B. Banman: Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I am honoured to rise today and respond to the Speech from the Throne. It is indeed a pleasure to see you back in the chair that you currently occupy.
Well, this year’s speech certainly followed a pattern of previous throne speeches, and it contained a slew of words and promises typical of a throne speech. The contents, however, are beginning to matter less and less to British Columbians, because if a government cannot put their words into actions, they remain just words.
[J. Tegart in the chair.]
This is the fifth throne speech we have heard from this government since 2017. Although I may be relatively new to this House, I can already hear a lot of the same old rhetoric — the same broken promises to make life more affordable, the same broken promises to make government more transparent and accessible and the same broken promises that this government will be there for British Columbians.
As you heard from my colleague from Fraser-Nicola, many of her constituents do not feel as if the government has been there for them. They’re feeling abandoned and neglected.
Every year this government outlines its ambitious plan of action that promises to improve British Columbians’ lives. But throughout this government’s administration, these speeches, sadly, have been followed by a year that completely fails to make their ambitious plans a reality. This government overpromises and underdelivers, if it delivers at all.
For years now, this government has run on a promise to make life more affordable to British Columbians. But today the cost of working, the cost of playing, the cost of raising our families and living in this province has never been higher — never.
Housing prices have reached an all-time high in Metro Vancouver and across the province, as we’ve heard. It is due in no small part to the abysmal failure of this government to meet its own housing supply targets. They overpromised and have underdelivered.
Recent stats from the real estate board of trade show that the average detached home in Metro Vancouver costs a whopping $2.3 million. Right now it would take someone 34 years to save for a down payment on a typical Vancouver home. Even my own hometown of Abbotsford has seen monumental jumps in housing prices, some as high as 40 percent of what they were this time last year.
Thanks to the inaction of this government, this is a problem that is no longer confined to the major urban areas of our province. Skyrocketing housing prices are even hitting rural communities that have traditionally given young British Columbians the greatest opportunity to build their lives, to raise their families within their budget. But the growing cost of living means this — sadly, tragically — is no longer the case. Many young families are now seeking elsewhere in Canada to live.
It is not just prospective homebuyers who are facing major economic challenges. Renters are finding it harder and harder every day to find affordable places to live — if they can find a place to live — and to save money, as well, to be able to purchase their dream home.
A report by the B.C. Real Estate Association found that the average rental rate for a one-bedroom apartment in Vancouver has become 18 percent more expensive since the pandemic. Overall, renters are paying $2,376 more per year under this NDP government, and the $400 renters rebate that they were promised — a key election promise, during a snap election, that was made by this government — is nowhere to be found. They overpromised and, as of yet, have failed to deliver. How is this making life more affordable for the average British Columbian?
The same British Columbians, under this government, are now paying more in taxes, more in rent, more in gas, more for their groceries and more just to live in this province. British Columbians aren’t just seeing more and more of their hard-earned money eaten up by the housing and rental market, or siphoned off to the government that promised to cut them a break. They are seeing it eaten up by the rising cost of basic necessities of everyday life.
Despite promises by the Premier himself — to address soaring gas prices, for instance — this government sat idle. It sat idle while prices at the pumps reached record highs. Early in January, gas prices in Vancouver set a whopping record, at $1.769 per litre. And the experts? Buckle up. The experts are saying that prices could soon reach a new, staggering record — a new normal — of $1.85 per litre. Gas prices in B.C. are more than 30 cents higher than at this time last year. People are forced to live in places other than where they work, because of affordability. They’re forcing that daily commute to be more costly every single day.
It’s not just at the pumps where British Columbians are paying more but in our grocery stores as well. A report by Dalhousie University Agri-Food Analytics Lab has forecast an overall food price increase of 5 to 7 percent for 2022. This means that B.C. households could be paying up to $1,000 more per year just to put the same food on their tables that they put on last year, under this government’s watch.
British Columbians are getting tired. They are getting weary of recycled messages that government is going to make life more affordable, when costs continue to go up year after year under this NDP government’s watch. They are growing tired of the empty words and of the empty, broken promises filled in these speeches.
Government has promised once again that they’re prepared to tackle climate change, but they have proven that they’re not even prepared to tackle the climate change emergencies that are upon us here and now.
During the heat dome that swept our province last summer, this government failed to communicate the incredible real dangers and ignored warnings from E-Comm that the emergency services were stretched far too thin. They were stretched far too thin to tackle the influx of 911 calls. As a result, 569 British Columbians died. They died due to heat exhaustion. Where was the government for their backs then? It’s mind-boggling to hear this government insist that they’re putting people first. Were they putting them first during the heatwave? Actions speak louder than words.
This government insists that they’re putting people first when there are still British Columbians from Lytton living in motels and on couches in friends’ spare rooms, desperately waiting for the promised support from government that will help them rebuild, help them rebuild and restore their businesses, their homes, their lives, their neighbourhoods that were destroyed by horrific wildfires. Does that sound like government has their back? They’re abandoned in the deep of winter. They can’t even find anywhere to rent. How much longer are we going to make them wait? Your words are meaningless without action.
Last November, at the onset of the atmospheric river, the risk of floods was building for several days. The experts were clear on this. Yet the Alert Ready system was not used — not one single time, not once to warn British Columbians of the oncoming dangers. It’s just completely unacceptable that our neighbours to the south had 48 hours more warning than we did. Forty-eight hours were lost — so that people of the Sumas Prairie could save their valuables, could move their animals, could move their equipment. We knew that the Nooksack was going to flood. How has that government got their backs?
The Nooksack flooded the Sumas Prairie. Thousands of farmers and residents were left stranded as they watched their livelihoods, their homes, their animals literally wash away before them. Now, when our farmers are embarking on the long and difficult road to recovery, they need leadership from our government more than ever. They don’t need words. They need leadership and action.
While the announcement of agriculture recovery funds is joyous welcome news, it remains to be seen if this funding will be released to farmers in a timely manner and meet the needs of our many different farmers and their agricultural practices. Will this just be one more case of overpromising and not delivering? I would suggest that we look to Lytton to see this government’s plan. There is no plan. They just can’t seem to get the money out the door. It was the same with the circuit breaker grants.
I am terribly concerned about the farmers in my riding who are banking on this. I think the money…. I hope the money will get there. I just hope it gets there in a timely manner.
The heatwave and floods have completely devastated the raspberry and blueberry crops in our region. It could be another decade — ten full years — before production is back to full capacity, before it’s back to the day before the floods. As these farmers begin the long and difficult process of reoxygenating their soil, repairing their barns, repairing their homes, repairing the infrastructure and replacing and repairing damaged and destroyed machinery, many of which could have been saved, they are preparing for this year’s planting and harvest yet once again.
It is so extremely frustrating that a government that so often speaks of the danger of climate change has failed at every single possible opportunity to properly prepare for and respond to climate-related disasters, leaving the people impacted on the ground to deal with the fallout. If you cannot be bothered to let people know that disaster is there, how do you expect them to believe your empty, hollow words of the throne speech? This is not the leadership that British Columbians deserve, and it most certainly is not putting British Columbians first. It is a messed-up idea of this government having their back.
Over the past year, our province has faced unprecedented crisis. Under this government, we have sadly seen a record number of opioid deaths, month after month after month, as the illicit and toxic drug supply chains destroy more and more lives in our communities. Opioid deaths in 2021 were 24 percent higher than in 2020, and this year is lining up to be just as horrific.
Overpromised. Under delivered. Despite promises for more action and support from this government, it baffles many of us how the budget for the Premier’s own office continues to be larger than the Ministry of Mental Health and Addictions. We know — the science is clear — that there is a direct link to mental health and opioid addictions, drugs and deaths. Yet the Premier’s office continues to be larger than the Ministry of Mental Health and Addictions. Doesn’t sound like that’s got any of those peoples’ backs, to me.
The time for words? It’s over. It’s not enough to add a handful of treatment beds here or there and call it a day. It’s not enough to have a shell game where we close down treatment beds over here, but we open some over there, but we’ve added these, when, in fact, we’re actually short on the change. What we need is immediate action to expand pathways to recovery and to bring more wraparound supports and services into our communities so that those who are experiencing homelessness and addiction can finally get the help they deserve — so far, overpromised and drastically under delivered.
The COVID-19 pandemic has shone a light on the many gaps that exist not only in our mental health and addictions and supports but in our entire health care system. Across the province, communities are facing a critical shortage of available doctors and hospital staff, so much so that ICU and emergency rooms are being forced to reduce their hours. How in heaven’s name does that make any sense — that during a pandemic, when all hands should be on deck, when we have record numbers of opioid deaths, we’re reducing hours and staffing in ICU and emergency rooms? What part of that is: “We have your back”?
The COVID-19 pandemic has pushed our health care system to the brink. Rather than provide the public with the clearest picture and direction possible, the COVID response has been mired in secrecy, misdirection and a clear priority to protect the reputation of government over the health and safety and well-being of British Columbians.
Government has cherry-picked the data and the disclosures that they make available to British Columbians to weave their own narrative about the state of our hospitals and health care system and pandemic response. They withheld vital reports on long-term-care homes and decided that this would be a great time to hold a snap election. Does that sound like they’ve got our backs?
They have kept vital tools like rapid tests out of the hands of British Columbians. As a matter of fact, they denied even having them until it was found in a warehouse. They’ve kept those rapid tests out of the hands of British Columbians while ignoring pleas from teachers and front-line workers for more PPE and supports. Go ask those folks if they think you’ve got their backs.
This NDP government claims to put people first and then make sure they’re the last ones to know the actual truth. Their agenda of reducing the openness, transparency and accountability of government was made all too perfectly clear last winter session with the passing of Bill 22.
By applying fees to freedom-of-information requests and reducing the scope and oversight of regulatory bodies like the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner, this government has made requesting and gathering information from government more difficult than ever before — information the people have paid for and have a right to access. Does that sound like you’ve got our backs? Does that sound like openness and transparency?
British Columbians were shocked to witness the hon. Minister of Citizens’ Services and all government members hold fast to their carefully constructed message that these actions were to improve transparency, not reduce it, and that the public should ignore the wave of public outcry from the bill and from the media outlets and government watchdogs, business associations and the general public themselves. “Don’t pay attention to that. Watch this hand over here.” It sounds like classic sidestep to me.
Now, as we look to bring an end to the pandemic — and we all want to return to normal — government has a responsibility to provide British Columbians the clarity and the leadership they’re looking for in these challenging times and to listen to the voices of all British Columbians. I’d like to say that this throne speech has more substance and action, but quite frankly, there’s so much recycled messaging and a repeat of the old same promises that it does not give me or many others much hope for the future.
Quite frankly, Madam Speaker — it’s a pleasure to see you in the chair for the first time — the time for empty words is over. The time for empty words is long since passed. Actions speak louder than words. The words sadly mean nothing. They’re hollow, because they’ve been repeated so many times and have not been addressed as of yet.
British Columbians want to see a clear plan to address housing affordability and a jobs plan to address our province’s growing labour shortage and build back the full-time and private sector jobs that have been lost over the past several years.
British Columbians want to see this government follow through on their promise of universal $10-a-day child care, rather than leave families waiting a decade or more for their next open spot. I guess you apply for your grandchildren or great-grandchildren. British Columbians want to see the people of Merritt, the people of Sumas Prairie, the people of Lytton receive the support they truly deserve to recover from the incredible heartbreak and devastation that they’ve endured.
Your words don’t mean much to these folks. Your words are just hollow. What they need are actions. They want to see a fundamental review of our province’s response to the climate disasters of last year so that we can better protect and support our communities against future events. British Columbians want to see clear action from this government to actually meet our climate action targets without costing our communities who depend on our natural resources and industries thousands and thousands of jobs.
British Columbians are tired of talk. They’re tired of it. They don’t believe it. There is a reason why we have mass demonstrations currently and the highest distrust in government that we’ve seen in decades. They want to see action. They want to see a lot of it. They want to see it today, not months from now.
I am hoping that this throne speech, filled with the same old promises, won’t mean a year of the same old government. I want to see action. British Columbians want to see action, because the government they have now is not worthy. British Columbians deserve a lot better than what they’ve had over the last few years. The time of blaming others is old. This government’s been in power long enough that they need to belly up to the bar and take responsibility for the inaction that they have been unable to do.
British Columbians need leadership right now. What they don’t need are more broken, empty promises and a throne speech that, quite frankly, they don’t believe a word of. So I would implore this government to actually roll your sleeves up and get the job done.
I watched in my neighbourhood. While government was standing around, it was neighbours helping neighbours. We saw it in Merritt. We saw it in Lytton. We saw it in the Sumas Prairie. It was the people that helped one another, while government couldn’t even be bothered to figure out how to declare a state of emergency in a timely manner. That’s not having our backs. Having our backs is actually doing what you say you’re going to do. So far, this government hasn’t been able to get that part of the message done. The words are there, but the actions are sadly, sadly absent.
Deputy Speaker: Recognizing the member for Richmond South Centre.
H. Yao: Thank you, Madam Chair. I echo my previous colleague as well. It’s nice to see you, for the first time, sitting in the chair. Thank you so much for allowing me to respond to the throne speech.
Before I start, I want to acknowledge I’m standing on the traditional and unceded territory of the Lək̓ʷəŋin̓əŋ-speaking peoples, the Songhees and Esquimalt First Nations.
Also, as an elected official, I represent Richmond South Centre, which is located on the unceded and traditional territory of the Musqueam, Kwantlen and Tsawwassen Coast Salish people. I thank them for allowing us to live, work and play on their ancestral land.
I also want to take a moment to wish everyone who celebrates the lunar new year a happy new year. I want to wish everybody a favourable Year of the Tiger that is filled with prosperity and good health.
I am going to talk in Cantonese as well. I’m pretty sure the member for Richmond North Centre is going to correct and laugh at me afterwards. I apologize for that.
虎年大吉,萬事如意,身體健康,恭喜發財
[Text provided by H. Yao.]
[Cantonese was spoken.]
Sorry. I apologize for that.
Also in Mandarin.
[Mandarin was spoken.]
Obviously, I speak Mandarin better.
I also wanted to take a moment to reflect on the throne speech, to reflect on the many lives lost during 2021. We experienced the pandemic, the toxic drug crisis, of course a heat dome, forest fires and a flood. Many lives, many families were broken. I wanted to take a moment to acknowledge that.
Earlier yesterday we had the privilege to listen to the throne speech, and I do want to say I’m just very excited to hear what our government has achieved in 2021 and how we look forward to the incoming 2022. I think one of the interesting things we want to say and is echoed in the throne speech is having 85,000 people moving here from other provinces and countries in the first three quarters of the year alone.
I understand there are different people using different measurements of the government’s success, but I think people using their feet to do the voting tends to be the best. Evidence demonstrates that B.C. remains one of the best places to live, work and raise a family.
Today I will first off talk about health care. We, unfortunately, have witnessed many differences and polarization in conversations and comments on social media when it comes to how we walk through the pandemic. I personally have also been bombarded with messages from different friends. Some people are asking for greater restrictions. They ask for ways of how we can actually reduce transmission of the disease. We also have heard from many people demanding freedom, a different perspective. We welcome all sides of this conversation, as long as the conversation is done in a respectful and civilized manner.
In our B.C. government, we took the approach that I personally am so glad we did. We decided not to let politicians or politics get involved. Instead, we listened to the guidance of Dr. Bonnie Henry, the provincial health officer, and her team. Every step of the way, we resisted falling into the temptation of going from one extreme to the other extreme, continuously letting science guide us as we approached how we address the pandemic. In many moments, temptation comes through, but we continue to find ways to balance people’s lives, not just physical health but also mental health.
I remember, for myself, during December 2021, when the pandemic was just hitting its fourth and fifth waves, due to omicron. I was listening to my parents talking about the limited time they could spend with their grandkids and how they appreciated that our government had a balanced approach, allowing us to still have a celebration in a limited and restrained capacity, allowing families to be together, when in 2020 December, that was not possible.
The reality here is, even based on my own baby girl, based on the way she interacted with her grandparents, it demonstrated the importance of social interaction and social connection whenever possible. My parents usually enjoy the time they spend with her, holding her, playing with her and interacting with her, yet when there is a time gap, you can sometimes see anxiety develop in young infants and young babies. We are always looking forward to helping strengthen our mental health for our children.
This is just another example of why it is so important that whenever we’re engaging in these pandemic health restrictions, we follow the science, follow Dr. Bonnie Henry, to continue to balance between work-life balance, the protection of British Columbians and the mental health of individuals.
Making sure people stay at home when they’re sick is another key part of our scientific approach to ensure that people do not have to pick between work or staying home when they’re sick. For too long, many British Columbians had to choose. Not anymore.
Our government made a change to ensure that B.C. workers have access to a minimum of five paid sick days every year so that when someone is coughing, when someone is not feeling well, when someone may have omicron, they can stay home instead of worrying about balancing the chequebook and going back to work. It helps us to continue to allow our business sector to be functional — and not allowing the pandemic to spread at different outbreaks at different points.
It also emphasized…. In the throne speech, we talked about the new urgent and primary care centre. I personally also had an experience in 2021 with UPCC Richmond. It was actually funny. Just the day before my UPCC was actually open, I got bitten by a dog. I actually still have the scar on my hand from when I was bitten by the dog. I sat in Richmond Hospital for eight hours. I realized that UPCCs are such a needed service to help alleviate the stress at the emergency rooms and the hospitals for those people who don’t have immediate emergencies to find a different means of medical support.
I know, in Richmond, a UPCC that opens Monday to Friday in the evenings and on weekends during the daytime. I often go there around 5 to 5:30 and realize that there are people already lining up trying to get in, because it is providing such a much-needed service to help us alleviate the stress for our health care system, so that individuals have access to more medical support when the doctors’ offices are closed or when the medical clinics are closed.
Of course, we cannot avoid talking about Richmond’s most recent 2021 hospital investment of $840 million for the upgrade of our north acute care tower. It is the biggest investment not just in health care but the biggest investment, period, in Richmond’s history. It’s something that has been in high demand and that the Richmond population has been continually asking for. I thank all MLAs for sharing their voices, sharing their concerns, continuously working with our government to ensure that this promise is continually moving forward.
When the minister made the announcement to invest $840 million, it was a huge rock dropped off my chest and off my constituents’ shoulders. We are relieved, because we’re always asking ourselves: “If our seniors need medical attention, when our medical system is being overwhelmed, what can we count on?” We must invest early, we must prepare early, and we must move forward to ensure that we have a proper health care system ready to match the population’s needs, not just today but including tomorrow as well.
I cannot, again, stop emphasizing the excitement I have for the investment of $840 million for the Richmond north acute care tower. Of course, we also hired thousands of health care workers over the last two years, 6,000 of them taking care of seniors in long-term-care homes or assisted living. We installed more additional equipment as well.
At the same time, we’re continuously addressing the gap that has been created at this point. I want to say that I’m proud of my Premier, who actually addressed the federal government, talking about the federal government’s and provincial government’s partnership when it comes to funding the health care system.
In the past, it used to be a 50-50 percent partnership, but most recently, according to the data, it’s now 22 percent and 78 percent, and the provincial Premiers across the country are all asking for 35 percent. Why? It’s because we really need to ask ourselves: how can we strengthen our health care system?
One of the things that COVID-19 worked to benefit for society is that it exposed many, many issues that need to be addressed. Our government knows more work needs to be done, but we also have laid a great foundation to catch up from the previous neglect that we will try to fulfil.
In the end, we need to be ready for the next pandemic or next disease or next bacterial germ that is going through our society. We need to invest in our health care. As the chair of the Council of the Federation, our government is taking the lead to invite all the Premiers to work with our federal government in asking for that 35 percent. We must and we need to push forward to modernize our health care and improve care for people.
One thing I again want to emphasize is the mental health component when it comes to the pandemic. I personally remember when I first felt some kind of symptoms in the beginning of 2021. I chose to self-isolate myself for two weeks. I knew how punishing that was. I had family to drop food off for me, even though I had a cough. I had a fever. I didn’t want to go out.
Now I have to ask myself: what will our society be addressing when we are moving forward to open up our community? Many families are now just starting to reconnect with seniors, reconnect with their loved ones. We are often looking at ways to support our families as we open up societies. So we are now increasing funding for a free and affordable counselling program and making it easier to support through enhanced virtual care and make historic investments in treatment and recoveries, because our health care took an enormous toll during the pandemic.
B.C. is also one of the provinces to continuously keep schools open and continuously supported our community to remain open, keep our economy open, as we moved forward. It helped our society to have a proper balance as it was engaged in different challenges.
If you don’t mind, I also would like to touch a bit on where our throne speech talked about the support and services for addictions. I think one thing I do want to take a bit of pride in is the effort of working with the federal government, hoping to decriminalize minor drug offences of carrying a small amount of illicit drugs for personal usage.
We need to fight against stigmatization that prevents people from seeking help, seeking support. Our government understood that we must come up with a realistic and functional approach to support individuals struggling with different kinds of addictions. I know some of my colleagues mentioned earlier about how mental health and addiction has a direct correlation. I want to say that anybody, everybody could potentially become addicted to different kinds of drugs under various circumstances.
Individuals, based on different circumstances, can make unfortunate choices that draw them into circumstances they cannot get out of. It’s not just simply a mental health issue. It’s a mental disease that we need to fight against. That’s why B.C. became the first province in Canada to offer prescribed safe supply, a critical step to prevent overdose from toxic drugs.
We will continuously work with our provincial health officers and will continue to work with our community services to ensure that we are finding different ways to support individuals struggling with addictions. We have increased the number of treatment beds for both youth and adults. Of course, we know much more needs to be done. Again, I want to express my sympathy for every family member, every individual who experienced a loss or experienced a broken family due to a toxic drug supply.
Now we’ll talk a bit about education, especially the fact that in the last two years, we saw just how important it is for in-person, in-class learning for our children, mental health–wise and for intellectual growth. I personally know, with some nephews and nieces, the importance for them to stay connected with their family.
I even remember one of our family members sharing a story of how their child’s behaviour actually struggled because of long months of lack of in-person learning, even though she took a transitional learning option with the Richmond school board. The parent later regretted it and realized the child needed in-person interaction to truly appreciate and truly strengthen their resilience and mental health.
School provides important support for children, especially the most vulnerable kids, and we want to make sure that we’ll continue to be there for our school system. Over the last four years, we’ve also had record funding for education. That has helped B.C. schools hire thousands of teachers and education assistants. That is one reason why I’m so proud of our throne speech by our government this year, because we’ve done such a comprehensive investment in health and education.
Of course, when we deal with mental health, when we deal with mental challenges, when we deal with stress, we also need to talk about racism and the importance of inclusivity. Our government is introducing new anti-racism data legislation this session, helping to pave the way for fair and better, diverse delivery of services.
By understanding whom we are serving and how our culture, language, ethnicity and background could interact with the services being provided, our government is finding a different way to better understand British Columbians and find a way to support all British Columbians.
In the days ahead, our government will take a major step towards establishing the first Chinese-Canadian museum in Canada, another great opportunity to celebrate the Chinese Canadians’ contribution to this country’s history. We all understand that Chinese Canadians, like many other cultures, contribute heavily to the success and prosperity of British Columbia, and we are so thankful to have a government establishing the first Chinese-Canadian museum in Canada, to showcase our historical growth.
Now, I do want to talk about affordability, which is one of the things I’m truly passionate about. Our government understood the importance of making life more affordable. It is a priority. I know some have probably mentioned this as lack of action, but I’m seeing that it’s all action from 2021, and we have a great vision for 2022. Interest on student loans removed. Bridge tolls in the Lower Mainland have been eliminated. Some 300,000 families are receiving the child opportunity benefit, putting thousands of dollars back into the pockets of those kids under the age of 18 years old.
I personally also benefited from this. Millions of drivers are benefiting from the biggest ICBC rate reduction for car insurance in B.C. history, saving people an average of almost $500. I saw those rebate cheques, and I saw my ICBC bill. It has made my life extremely affordable as well.
Hundreds of thousands of families also benefited from free transit for kids under 12. I know a family specifically approached me because they have four kids under 12 and how much easier it is for them to take the kids and visit different parts of Richmond, because of the free transportation for kids under 12. Often, as a family gets bigger, younger children in the family tend to create a lot of financial limitations. This kind of free transit does help families have a greater opportunity to access different kinds of community services and helps the kids experience the world.
People living on low incomes will continue to benefit from the first-ever increase to the seniors supplement and the largest-ever increase to social assistance. Those are real actions.
I also want to talk about, as many people have mentioned, child care. The $10-a-day child care is a promise that our government made, and we’ve made many concrete steps towards it. Many families are already benefiting from thousands of new spaces and have saved up to $19,000 a year in lower fees. Our government will build on our progress made by more than doubling the $10-a-day child care spaces and reducing average fees by as much as 50 percent by the end of this year.
I’m excited about this news. I know my child and my family will benefit from opportunities such as this. We understand the importance of the child care benefit in allowing individuals who are primary caretakers, as a parent to a child, to be freed and be able to pursue their career, to explore their potential, to discover how they can be part of a community, to allow their work to continue, to truly find a way to live their life to the fullest. Having a kid should not be a punishment in regard to a family.
Having a kid should be celebrated, just as many of my colleagues here, including Madam Speaker as well, celebrated the introduction of new members to our family. This should never come with a price tag that we should be worried about. Our government has British Columbia’s back. We’ll continue to allow British Columbians to find fulfilment, find work-life balance and continue working towards $10-a-day child care for all British Columbians who have younger children.
Of course, housing is a major issue for British Columbia as well. Our government has already taken many actions. According to the throne speech, we’ve banned renovictions, we’ve cracked down on speculation, we’ve frozen rent increases during the pandemic and capped rent increases to inflation. We’ve also helped people who were entrenched in homelessness encampments in cities across the province into safer housing.
We’re building 8,000 new on campus student housing beds as well. Since 2017, 52,000 new rental homes have been registered in B.C. That’s more than the previous 15 years combined.
Our government understood that home ownership and a place to live or to have a place that is an affordable rental is essential to life, essential to a proper work-life balance. British Columbians know that the provincial government has got their back.
We’re also making low-cost financing available to encourage building homes that middle class families can afford. We’re making the largest investment in affordable housing in B.C.’s history, with 32,000 homes built or on the way already. This spring, we’ll introduce a cooling-off period on home purchases to protect people when they are buying a home, especially in a volatile market.
We understand that housing affordability has been a challenge for many British Columbians, including individuals and constituents who live in Richmond South Centre. Our government is working hard to bring affordability for British Columbians and to Richmond South Centre constituents. It is not a problem easily resolved, but we’re working hard with the federal government, and we’re working hard to introduce affordable units, and building more units to allow our constituents to have a potential affordable future with housing.
I also want to talk a little bit more about forestry and reconciliation. I know that for the last year, including even till now, we’ve had many constituents approaching us, talking about the importance of combatting climate change, the importance of protecting our forests and the importance of reconciliation. Our government is approaching this challenge in a collaborative and cooperative approach, by working with Indigenous communities and Indigenous governments to ensure that we find a way to allowing them to be equal partners in deciding how we can defer 2.6 million hectares of our most at-risk old-growth forests.
B.C.’s also leading the country in reforestation, planting more than one billion trees since 2018, including more than 300 million last year. Forestry is and will remain a foundation of B.C.’s economy, and forestry will, again, be a key factor for B.C. as we move forward. We can never deny the importance of climate change as well, as we continue to find ways to support British Columbians in a challenging time ahead.
In my conclusion and final remarks, I’ll talk about the economy. As we all know, recently British Columbia has demonstrated that we have the lowest unemployment rate, that we have one of the strongest economic recoveries and that we have a strong business climate where people want to come and invest. Despite the disruption of an unprecedented pandemic, unprecedented climate emergencies and an unprecedented opioid toxic drug crisis, B.C. continues to find a way to work together to have strong resilience and to thrive through challenges.
We’re glad to be part of the British Columbia government, and we’re glad to be working with British Columbians, continuously finding ways to build a fair, safer, and stronger B.C. for all.
M. Dykeman: It truly is an honour to stand here in the chamber today to rise and speak in support of the throne speech, coming here on the traditional territories of the Lək̓ʷəŋin̓əŋ peoples, the Songhees and the Esquimalt Nations.
It truly has been quite the year. It’s been a challenging year for so many people, and I’m so proud to be the member for Langley East, to be elected by the people of the township of Langley to represent such a fantastic community, which resides on the traditional territories of the Kwantlen, Katzie and Semiahmoo Nations.
I would be remiss if I didn’t start off by acknowledging how I can only do this work because of some incredible people that work with me each day: my fantastic CAs — Carly Haugen, Madison Portner, Aidan Hooper — as well as my amazing LA here, Trudy Maygard.
I also wanted to just take a second. Last time I stood in the House, I also had another CA named Candy Ashdown, who truly is one of my very best friends. She was actually my campaign manager and came to work with me and set me up for success, along with all the other hard-working people that work with me. But Candy took this time to do so away from her real estate business, and she’s returned now to go back to that, after making sure that we were good in that year.
We all terribly miss her and thank her for all the time she spent. She’s always there, but she really did go above and beyond, walking a journey that I certainly had never planned. Like I said, I’m so proud to be in this role, but it certainly wasn’t something that we had been sitting and looking at years and years ahead. Candy and I had served together as trustees. We’ve campaigned together several times, and she’s just an all-around wonderful person. I miss her terribly but thank her for the year she gave to make sure that we were okay in a really strange time.
I think all of us sitting in this chamber will attest to being a first-term MLA in this period of time is a little bit different. We’ve had a pandemic. We’ve had wildfires. We’ve had flooding. I mean, I just heard the most moving speech from one of my colleagues, talking about the challenges within Lytton.
We’ve all had very challenging years. As a farmer myself, seeing the challenges that have taken place within my community and others — out with my other colleagues in Chilliwack, Abbotsford, Mission and throughout the province — it really has been a difficult time.
Recently I had lunch with someone, and they looked at me and said: “Why on earth would you ever want to run to be an MLA? What possibly would possess you to do so?” And they said: “Tell us. What made you run for the party you’ve run for? Why are you so proud to be an MLA?” It was really simple. It was a really simple answer. I actually surprised myself at how quickly I could answer it.
Well, the truth is that we cannot be an economically strong province and country — we cannot be a prosperous community — when 10 percent of the country lives in poverty, when over 3.7 million people are poor. And that’s just the standard — like, the number we’ve picked. That doesn’t recognize all the other people that struggle. We live in this very wonderful province, which is so attractive to so many people, but with that comes a higher price tag, as we’ve seen.
When one in eight homes is food insecure…. Over 4.4 million people in our country are food insecure. Once again, by the definition of “food insecure….” This is based on the prior census data, and we’ll start to get a better picture of what that looks like. When I was school board chair and everything was going on with the pandemic and then we walked into a shutdown of the schools, our school district alone was feeding 650 families during the pandemic. That’s terrifying.
That’s why I ran. I don’t believe that economic growth should be fuelled by societal decline. I don’t believe that it’s a binary choice. I don’t believe that we can accept the rhetoric. There’s this false dichotomy, the narrative that goes around that says: “Don’t invest in these social programs because of a looming economic disaster.”
I actually believe that the narrative is reversed. I believe the narrative is that we can’t be an economically strong province or nation unless we invest in these social programs, unless we invest in our future, unless we invest in making sure that we don’t have large amounts of people who are left behind. I’m proud that our government recognizes that. We’ve demonstrated that. We’ve demonstrated that this divisive thinking is a fallacy. We have taken the time to invest and work to raise people up.
We’ve reinvested in starved areas, which has resulted in British Columbia being the strongest economy in Canada — and, I would argue, not despite these investments but because we have invested in these areas. That’s something that we should be proud of and we should celebrate, but there is a lot more work to do.
Yes, it’s been a terribly challenging year, as I opened with. People are still struggling, and the road out there is going to be tough, and it’s going to require us to come together. It’s going to require us to support those who need the support and invest in the economy to ensure that we remain on a positive trajectory.
I want to illustrate this in five stories from my community. Education is something that was my beginning in politics. I was proud to serve as a trustee for ten years, as many of my colleagues even sitting in here right now have. It’s an interesting place to get your feet wet, because the challenging part about being a trustee is sort of, oftentimes…. Really, you’re kind of looking at how to move things along, and you’re working in a co-governance model with the province. We used to joke — and it very much is a joke — that nobody was happy at the end of the day. That’s what your role as trustee is.
Honestly, though, all joking aside, the things that I got to see happen, as we evolved…. We moved things through like the new curriculum, investing in child care spaces and neighbourhood places of learning. All the different things that have evolved over our time in education have been things that really gave me a foundation and allowed me to have a reinforcement of how important these societal investments are.
The wisest investment we can make in the world is in our future — our children, our schools, our education. The greatest indicator of a democracy is an educated population. So it’s something that is very, very important to me.
We saw the opening of Donna Gabriel Elementary School, named after a member of the Kwantlen First Nation. A very influential language program was started by and supported with Donna Gabriel and others. That school really does represent reconciliation. So many elements in the development of the school were in partnership with the nations which our school district resides upon.
We’ve seen the seismic upgrades of Vanguard School and Shortreed Elementary. We’ve seen $10 daycare and 789 licensed spaces through Childcare B.C. in our community. Langley is one of the fastest-growing communities in British Columbia, so these new daycare spaces are so important. We actually — the census numbers came out today — found out that since 2016 we have grown by 13.9 percent. Thousands of homes are being built each year, and those daycare spaces are needed.
Those investments in our community make a difference in everyday people’s lives — people who are going to work, people who want to raise their families in our great community. Langley is such a special community. We have a rapidly growing urban area, but we also have a strong and proud agricultural community. These investments are surely making a difference in the lives of the 20,000 students that are in the Langley school district and those that are coming behind, and I’m super excited about them.
With that rapidly growing community come other challenges. It means pressures on things like health care. We have seen, recently, some wonderful investments in Langley Memorial Hospital, which is in my riding. We’ve seen emergency room expansion, while increasing our trauma beds from 31 to 49. We saw the addition of six new mental health beds in our emergency room, as well as the expansion of our hospital pharmacy, an upgrade to the electrical infrastructure and a new MRI.
Those investments make a difference in the lives of people who live in the township of Langley and in my colleague and friend’s riding, which also encompasses Langley city. We are two Langleys; we work well together, though. We have growing needs within our communities. I know that my colleague and I are super excited about those investments, and I’m very proud to work with my colleague.
We also need to recognize, though, that those investments wouldn’t have happened without the hard work of the Langley Memorial Hospital Foundation, with the leadership of the executive director, Heather Scott; the board chair, Michael Leggatt; and the rest of the board, who work hard. They raised millions of dollars to support health care in our community. As our government is reinvesting in this important area and ensuring that we are keeping up with the rapid growth of our province — and specifically where I represent, the township of Langley — the hospital foundation is there.
We also saw the new Langley Memorial Hospital palliative care hospice, which is going to be opening very shortly — another initiative which the foundation also supported and which our government was proud to support. I’m super excited to see that. We toured it recently. It’s really going to be a community building, a building that will allow families to be there at such a difficult time, when many people need to spend days by the side of their loved ones.
My mom passed away there many years ago. Without the hospice, I don’t think our family would have been able to deal with the stress. It would have been a matter, you know, of one person coming in and one person going out. And what do you do? The hospice allowed my mom to go through her end of life with dignity, while allowing my father — they were married for nearly 50 years — to be there without all of the stress and to receive the care and support he needed, while giving the support my mom needed.
I’m really excited to see our community have a new, larger hospice with new, shared spaces like larger rooms, indoor-outdoor spaces, a youth-dedicated area and what they call a hospice spa, which will allow additional comfort measures. I want to thank everybody who worked so hard on that initiative.
Once again, the other pressures that come with it are social services. Our community received $2.5 million in the strengthening communities grant for homeless strategies, as well as $25,000 for poverty reduction. As our community grows, so do the complex social needs, which you can’t look at in a vacuum. They’re complex, from mental health to addiction to economic disadvantage and education needs, but these complex needs come together. They often manifest in people experiencing homelessness.
One of the things that we did after receiving this grant was that we actually put together a table. I was very proud to be able to help organize that. Many people came together and sat at the table. My counterpart, the MLA for Langley, sits at the table, along with two mayors, of both municipalities. Often the MPs join us at this table to discuss the challenges and how we can work together, because we can’t work apart. We have two municipalities. We have multiple levels of government. Often, we all want to work independently, but really, that often just creates more work.
This table, which is supported by Stepping Stone community services, township of Langley, the city of Langley, Langley Community Services Society, Lower Fraser Valley Aboriginal Society, Gateway of Hope, Lookout Housing, B.C. Housing, Encompass Support Services, the RCMP, Ishtar Women’s Resources, Fraser Health and others who come from time to time, when needed, tackle issues like emergency weather shelters, tackle long-term vision and identify gaps of things that we need like, maybe, mental health support with policing.
That money that came to our community allows us to work together with operators and people at decision-making levels to come together and solve these complex challenges. So that’s something that I know our community is super excited about and super proud of: the work we’re doing together.
One thing about Langley — having lived there, farmed there and raised my children there — is that when there is a challenge, we come together as a community. Like many communities that have agricultural roots, we look at a problem and figure: “How can we tackle it?” And this is another example of that. I’m really proud of all of the operators. I mean, I’m the least informed person in the room, as a politician, so to be able to sit around all these people who know so much, to come together, has really been a learning experience. Something that I can’t say enough about is how fortunate I feel to be able to sit at that table.
We have undertaken some pretty significant growth, as I mentioned, and we’re going to continue to grow. As we heard in the throne speech, our needs are changing, for skills. There is a gap. There is an expectation that we could be looking at a million jobs that need to be filled.
Another initiative, through my office, that we set up, is the economic advisory table. People who, often, you would probably characterize as critics were invited to the table to sit down and talk about what it will look like. What would success look like in Langley if we had a strong economic recovery?
It’s a very broad question. Boy, my economic advisory committee — which consists of Gemma Martini; Joel Schacter; John Tomlinson; Rod Ross, the chair of the Langley board of education; Scott Waddle; Stephen Gregorig; Dave Melnychuk; Frank Bucholtz; Rhonda Driediger; and Ron Toigo — sure bring some great ideas together.
We’ve talked about how jobs are a challenge. I was thrilled to see that in our throne speech — a view to the fact that we have a workplace that is changing. It has changing needs. We have a workplace that certainly has diverse needs. So maybe we don’t have the skills we need. We’ve also got gaps of people.
I was thrilled, the other day, because in addition to the 64 new health care assistant seats that Kwantlen Polytechnic University is offering to help address some of our health care gaps, we also have some really exciting things going on with universities that have spots in my riding and, also, in other campuses.
Kwantlen Polytechnic University wrote to myself and my colleague and let us know that they have new opportunities to learn the skills needed to enter video game development, which is something that really is growing in this area. They’re looking at expanding skills training for video game development, visual effects and the animation industry, working in a collaboration with KPU, Kwantlen Polytechnic University, and the Centre for Entertainment Arts, which is really exciting.
This will offer four diploma programs. It was really neat to see how excited the university was to talk about this, because it’s meeting our growing needs.
Also, Martini Studios, which resides in my riding, is part of an initiative for motion picture skills. Our film industry is so important to our economy. There are so many wonderful productions going on in our community and in the rest of British Columbia. It employs so many people. I just have to say that they’ve been just fantastic, too, during the challenges of COVID.
That’s an industry that was able to get back to work pretty quick because of the work they put into making sure they had a safe workplace for people. So seeing that part of our economy continue growing….
They are working to provide a training program to ensure that people who work in the film industry are able to meet the needs on set — another changing and adapting to the changing needs of the workforce. That was a pretty wonderful email, also, to receive from a constituent of mine.
[Mr. Speaker in the chair.]
I also want to — I’ve only got a few minutes left — just close talking a little bit about community. We’ve received some wonderful funding in our riding to recognize important parts of tourism and reconciliation. For instance, the Salishan Place museum, the Langley Museum and other tourist and arts initiatives in our community received some funding. I’m really grateful that we’ve received that, because right now, with all the division in the world, things that bring us together are important.
Often we define ourselves by who we’re not: “We’re not them. We’re not part of this party. We’re not those people over there. We’re not from here; we’re from there.” We often have conversations about who we’re not. Right now with all of the challenges we faced, it’s really important that we remember that certain things are not the enemy. We’re dealing with a virus. It’s the enemy. We, as individuals, are not each other’s enemy.
We have to remember that as we’re going through challenges with the environment, we need to come together, because if we don’t come together to fight those challenges, we’re not as strong as we can be. Looking in the educational classrooms, looking in our communities, looking to our friends, I think it’s important that we remember what we’re fighting for, not what we’re fighting against.
That, leading back to the beginning where I opened and when people asked me why I was proud to run…. Like I said, we don’t have to abandon or do things at the expense of our most vulnerable. We need to fund to lift things up. We don’t have to be divisive in our actions. We need to work together to lift our province up.
I’m proud to be part of a government that recognizes that, and I believe, firmly, that that’s why we are in the position we’re in — being such an economic leader in our country and having the, really, very minor disruption during COVID. We’ve been able to pursue most things. We need to remember that as we’re coming out, because one thing we can’t do is leave ourselves vulnerable in society as we exit out of the pandemic. The pandemic will change, but our society will be there at the end.
I’m proud of the fact that that’s something that stayed at the forefront of our government. At the end of the day, we’re all in this together, and we’re all going to come out of this together.
With that, I’m going to take my seat now. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Speech from the Throne.
M. Dykeman moved adjournment of debate.
Motion approved.
Hon. M. Rankin moved adjournment of the House.
Motion approved.
Mr. Speaker: This House stands adjourned until 10 a.m. tomorrow.
The House adjourned at 6:44 p.m.